These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9535528)

  • 41. An initial study on lip perception of electrotactile array stimulation.
    Liu W; Tang H
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(5):705-14. PubMed ID: 16586196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparing cutaneous perception induced by electrical stimulation using rectangular and round shaped electrodes.
    Ambrus GG; Antal A; Paulus W
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2011 Apr; 122(4):803-7. PubMed ID: 20980196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Transfer information enhancement with a 2-D tactile stimulator array for acoustic vision substitute system.
    Taki H; Sato T
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():4909-12. PubMed ID: 17945867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Safety studies with the University of Melbourne multichannel electrotactile speech processor.
    Cowan RS; Blamey PJ; Alcántara JI; Blombery PA; Hopkins IJ; Whitford LA; Clark GM
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1992; 29(1):35-52. PubMed ID: 1740777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effect of saccades in tongue electrotactile stimulation for vision substitution applications.
    Chekhchoukh A; Vuillerme N; Payan Y; Glade N
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3543-6. PubMed ID: 24110494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Electrocutaneous stimulation with high voltage capacitive discharges.
    Reilly JP; Larkin WD
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1983 Oct; 30(10):631-41. PubMed ID: 6654369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The TDS: a new device for comparing active and passive-guided touch.
    Richardson B; Symmons M; Accardi R
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 2000 Sep; 8(3):414-7. PubMed ID: 11001521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Object localization, discrimination, and grasping with the optic nerve visual prosthesis.
    Duret F; Brelén ME; Lambert V; Gérard B; Delbeke J; Veraart C
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2006; 24(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 16518026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effective electrode configuration for selective stimulation with inner eye prostheses.
    Rattay F; Resatz S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Sep; 51(9):1659-64. PubMed ID: 15376514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Time-varying cortical activations related to visual-tactile cross-modal links in spatial selective attention.
    Kida T; Inui K; Wasaka T; Akatsuka K; Tanaka E; Kakigi R
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3585-96. PubMed ID: 17360823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Perceptual analysis of vibrotactile flows on a mobile device.
    Seo J; Choi S
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2013; 6(4):522-7. PubMed ID: 24808404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dynamic and predictive links between touch and vision.
    Gray R; Tan HZ
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jul; 145(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 12070744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Discriminating speech rhythms in audition, vision, and touch.
    Navarra J; Soto-Faraco S; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():197-205. PubMed ID: 25046133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Cross-Modal Correspondence Among Vision, Audition, and Touch in Natural Objects: An Investigation of the Perceptual Properties of Wood.
    Kanaya S; Kariya K; Fujisaki W
    Perception; 2016 Oct; 45(10):1099-114. PubMed ID: 27257036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Optimal visual-haptic integration with articulated tools.
    Takahashi C; Watt SJ
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 May; 235(5):1361-1373. PubMed ID: 28214998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Visuo-tactile interactions are dependent on the predictive value of the visual stimulus.
    Kandula M; Hofman D; Dijkerman HC
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Apr; 70():358-66. PubMed ID: 25498404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Perceptual improvement following repetitive sensory stimulation depends monotonically on stimulation intensity.
    Schlieper S; Dinse HR
    Brain Stimul; 2012 Oct; 5(4):647-51. PubMed ID: 21962984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparative Evaluation of Tactile Sensation by Electrical and Mechanical Stimulation.
    Yem V; Kajimoto H
    IEEE Trans Haptics; 2017; 10(1):130-134. PubMed ID: 28113382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Feeling by sight or seeing by touch?
    Merabet L; Thut G; Murray B; Andrews J; Hsiao S; Pascual-Leone A
    Neuron; 2004 Apr; 42(1):173-9. PubMed ID: 15066274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Lost in the move? Secondary task performance impairs tactile change detection on the body.
    Gallace A; Zeeden S; Röder B; Spence C
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):215-29. PubMed ID: 19647451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.