These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9536131)

  • 21. Towards a knowledge based health service.
    Smith R
    BMJ; 1994 Jul; 309(6949):217-8. PubMed ID: 8069135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Setting priorities for the adoption of health technologies on a national level -- the Israeli experience.
    Shani S; Siebzehner MI; Luxenburg O; Shemer J
    Health Policy; 2000 Dec; 54(3):169-85. PubMed ID: 11154787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Health technology assessment in Australia: the role of AHTAC. Australian Health Technology Advisory Committee.
    Kearney B; Willis E
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1997 Dec; 20(4):193-7. PubMed ID: 9503689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Health technology assessment and the NHS R&D initiative.
    Smith MA
    J Med Eng Technol; 1996; 20(6):192-5. PubMed ID: 9029390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assisted conception techniques. On what basis do health technologies become routinely available when they have been assessed as effective?
    Freemantle N; Watt I
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1995; 11(4):786-94. PubMed ID: 8567211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Priority setting for health technology assessment. Theoretical considerations and practical approaches. Priority setting Subgroup of the EUR-ASSESS Project.
    Henshall C; Oortwijn W; Stevens A; Granados A; Banta D
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1997; 13(2):144-85. PubMed ID: 9194351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Innovation under wraps.
    Torjesen I
    Health Serv J; 2008 Feb; ():26-8. PubMed ID: 18396532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. NICE system...shame about the side-effects.
    McVie G
    Lancet Oncol; 2003 Apr; 4(4):203. PubMed ID: 12681259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. ABPI call for NICE guidance to be made mandatory.
    Tiner R
    Lancet Oncol; 2003 Apr; 4(4):203-4. PubMed ID: 12681260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Medical technology: assessment, adoption, and utilization.
    Greer AL
    J Med Syst; 1981; 5(1-2):129-45. PubMed ID: 7021731
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Coverage with evidence development: an examination of conceptual and policy issues.
    Hutton J; Trueman P; Henshall C
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2007; 23(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 17937829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Another special relationship? Interactions between health technology policies and health care systems in the United States and the United Kingdom.
    Sampat B; Drummond M
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2011 Feb; 36(1):119-39. PubMed ID: 21498797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Telemedicine. Telly addicts?
    Mitchell P
    Health Serv J; 1999 Mar; 109(5646):suppl 4-5. PubMed ID: 10346279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Using innovation technology to enhance patient care delivery.
    Kremsdorf R
    Nurs Outlook; 2003; 51(3):S16-20. PubMed ID: 12830124
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical technology. A cut above.
    Cross M
    Health Serv J; 1997 Jun; 107(5558):suppl 6. PubMed ID: 10168725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical engineers: stewards of healthcare technologies.
    Grimes SL
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 2004; 23(3):56-8. PubMed ID: 15354995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Making decisions on technology availability in the British National Health Service--why we need reliable models.
    Akehurst RL
    Value Health; 2003; 6(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 12535232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The impact of the UK NHS purchaser-provider split on the 'rational' introduction of new medical technologies.
    Rosen R; Mays N
    Health Policy; 1998 Feb; 43(2):103-23. PubMed ID: 10177613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Decision makers' perceptions of health technology decision making and priority setting at the institutional level.
    Gallego G; Fowler S; van Gool K
    Aust Health Rev; 2008 Aug; 32(3):520-7. PubMed ID: 18666881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Considering the value associated with innovation in health technology appraisal decisions (deliberations): a NICE thing to do?
    Green C
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2010; 8(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 20038189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.