These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Relation between fixation disparity and the asymmetry between convergent and divergent disparity step responses. Jaschinski W; Svede A; Jainta S Vision Res; 2008 Jan; 48(2):253-63. PubMed ID: 18164741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Short-latency disparity vergence responses and their dependence on a prior saccadic eye movement. Busettini C; Miles FA; Krauzlis RJ J Neurophysiol; 1996 Apr; 75(4):1392-410. PubMed ID: 8727386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Individual objective versus subjective fixation disparity as a function of forced vergence. Jaschinski W PLoS One; 2018; 13(7):e0199958. PubMed ID: 29980146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of nonius line and fusion lock parameters on fixation disparity. Ukwade MT Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Jun; 77(6):309-20. PubMed ID: 10879788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Capture of visual direction in dynamic vergence is reduced with flashed monocular lines. Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Schürer M Vision Res; 2006 Aug; 46(16):2608-14. PubMed ID: 16530245 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of stimulus size and eccentricity on horizontal and vertical vergence. Howard IP; Fang X; Allison RS; Zacher JE Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 130(2):124-32. PubMed ID: 10672465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Central and peripheral visual interactions in disparity-induced vergence eye movements: I. Spatial interaction. Tanimoto N; Takagi M; Bando T; Abe H; Hasegawa S; Usui T; Miki A; Zee DS Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Apr; 45(4):1132-8. PubMed ID: 15037579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Objective vs subjective measures of fixation disparity for short and long fixation periods. Jaschinski W; Jainta S; Kloke WB Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jul; 30(4):379-90. PubMed ID: 20629960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vergence dynamics and variability of fixation disparity in children and adults. Jaschinski W; König M Strabismus; 2006 Jun; 14(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 16760113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Depth perception in random dot stereograms is not affected by changes in either vergence or accommodation. Gonzalez F; Rivadulla C; Perez R; Cadarso C Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Oct; 75(10):743-7. PubMed ID: 9798214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-latency disparity-vergence eye movements in humans: sensitivity to simulated orthogonal tropias. Yang DS; FitzGibbon EJ; Miles FA Vision Res; 2003 Feb; 43(4):431-43. PubMed ID: 12536000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective and subjective measures of vergence step responses. Jainta S; Hoormann J; Jaschinski W Vision Res; 2007 Dec; 47(26):3238-46. PubMed ID: 17959213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative analysis of vertical and horizontal fixation disparity in sentence reading. Jainta S; Blythe HI; Nikolova M; Jones MO; Liversedge SP Vision Res; 2015 May; 110(Pt A):118-27. PubMed ID: 25839421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shape discrimination for rectangles defined by disparity alone, by disparity plus luminance and by disparity plus motion. Regan D; Hamstra SJ Vision Res; 1994 Sep; 34(17):2277-91. PubMed ID: 7941421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]