151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9536406)
1. Acute irritation thresholds in subjects with type I--type VI skin.
McFadden JP; Wakelin SH; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Mar; 38(3):147-9. PubMed ID: 9536406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Irritant thresholds in subjects with colophony allergy.
Smith HR; Holloway D; Armstrong DK; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Feb; 42(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 10703632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Profile of irritant patch testing with detergents: sodium lauryl sulfate, sodium laureth sulfate and alkyl polyglucoside.
Löffler H; Happle R
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Jan; 48(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 12641575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation.
Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP
Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined effects of irritants and allergens. Synergistic effects of nickel and sodium lauryl sulfate in nickel- sensitized individuals.
Agner T; Johansen JD; Overgaard L; Vølund A; Basketter D; Menné T
Contact Dermatitis; 2002 Jul; 47(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 12225409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis.
Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating skin-protective materials against contact irritants and allergens. An in vivo screening human model.
Zhai H; Willard P; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Mar; 38(3):155-8. PubMed ID: 9536408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical morphology of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) and nonanoic acid (NAA) irritant patch test reactions at 48 h and 96 h in 152 subjects.
Reiche L; Willis C; Wilkinson J; Shaw S; de Lacharrière O
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Nov; 39(5):240-3. PubMed ID: 9840260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of a 4-h human patch test method for comparative and investigative assessment of skin irritation.
Robinson MK; Perkins MA; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 1998 Apr; 38(4):194-202. PubMed ID: 9565290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can a positive photopatch test be elicited by subclinical irritancy or allergy plus suberythemal UV exposure?
Beattie PE; Traynor NJ; Woods JA; Dawe RS; Ferguson J; Ibbotson SH
Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):235-40. PubMed ID: 15606647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skin irritability to sodium lauryl sulfate is associated with increased positive patch test reactions.
Schwitulla J; Brasch J; Löffler H; Schnuch A; Geier J; Uter W
Br J Dermatol; 2014 Jul; 171(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 24593017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant.
Geier J; Uter W; Pirker C; Frosch PJ
Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12694214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reduced levels of glutathione S-transferases in patch test reactions to dithranol and sodium lauryl sulphate as demonstrated by quantitative immunocytochemistry: evidence for oxidative stress in acute irritant contact dermatitis.
Willis CM; Britton LE; Reiche L; Wilkinson JD
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 11275802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intra-individual variations in acute and cumulative skin irritation responses.
Robinson MK
Contact Dermatitis; 2001 Aug; 45(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 11553116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Echographic evaluation of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS)-induced irritation in mice.
Seidenari S; Zanella C; Pepe P
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 Jan; 30(1):41-2. PubMed ID: 8156762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Surfactant-induced skin irritation and skin repair: evaluation of a cumulative human irritation model by noninvasive techniques.
Wilhelm KP; Freitag G; Wolff HH
J Am Acad Dermatol; 1994 Dec; 31(6):981-7. PubMed ID: 7962781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing.
Uter W; Geier J; Becker D; Brasch J; Löffler H
Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):259-62. PubMed ID: 15606650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study of cumulative irritant contact dermatitis in man utilizing open application on subclinically irritated skin.
Lee CH; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 1994 May; 30(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 8088139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pitfalls of irritant patch testing using different test chamber sizes.
Löffler H; Freyschmidt-Paul P; Effendy I; Maibach HI
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Mar; 12(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 11244137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
