These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9536877)

  • 1. Reliable keratometry with a new hand held surgical keratometer: calibration of the keratoscopic astigmatic ruler.
    Morlet N; Maloof A; Wingate N; Lindsay P
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jan; 82(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 9536877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intraoperative semiquantitative keratometry using the keratoscopic astigmatic ruler.
    Morlet N; Lindsay PA
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1995 Nov; 21(6):616-9. PubMed ID: 8551436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of two semi-quantitative surgical keratometers: the modified Hyde ruler and the Barrett keratoscope with "astigmatic dial".
    Morlet N; Lindsay P; Cooke P
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1994 Mar; 25(3):144-9. PubMed ID: 8196916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies.
    Visser N; Berendschot TT; Verbakel F; de Brabander J; Nuijts RM
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1764-70. PubMed ID: 22999600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Repeatability of the hand-held Nidek auto-keratometer in children.
    Noonan CP; Mackenzie J; Chandna A
    J AAPOS; 1998 Jun; 2(3):186-7. PubMed ID: 10532758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of keratometry and computerised videokeratography: intraobserver and interobserver variability on normal and astigmatic corneas.
    Karabatsas CH; Cook SD; Papaefthymiou J; Turner P; Sparrow JM
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 82(6):637-42. PubMed ID: 9797664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical utility of the Barrett keratoscope with astigmatic dial.
    Morlet N
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1994 Mar; 25(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 8196917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the Hyde surgical astigmatic ruler.
    House PH; Chauhan BC
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1988 Aug; 19(8):554-8. PubMed ID: 3173975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of corneal powers obtained from 4 different devices.
    Shirayama M; Wang L; Weikert MP; Koch DD
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Oct; 148(4):528-535.e1. PubMed ID: 19541287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Agreement between a partial coherence interferometer and 2 manual keratometers.
    Bullimore MA; Buehren T; Bissmann W
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1550-60. PubMed ID: 23876813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeatability and reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements using a noncontact optical low-coherence reflectometer and keratometer.
    Shammas HJ; Hoffer KJ
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jan; 153(1):55-61.e2. PubMed ID: 21907967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of refractive outcomes using five devices for the assessment of preoperative corneal power.
    Whang WJ; Byun YS; Joo CK
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012 Jul; 40(5):425-32. PubMed ID: 22394318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measurement of corneal curvature after corneal transplantation and radial keratotomy using standard and automated keratometry.
    Binder PS
    CLAO J; 1989; 15(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 2673574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validation of a handheld automated keratometer in adults.
    Noonan CP; Rao GP; Kaye SB; Green JR; Chandna A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Mar; 24(3):411-4. PubMed ID: 9559480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of corneal curvature using verion optical imaging system: a comparative study.
    Lauschke JL; Lawless M; Sutton G; Roberts TV; Hodge C
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 44(5):369-76. PubMed ID: 27381574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A handheld open-field infant keratometer (an american ophthalmological society thesis).
    Miller JM
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2010 Dec; 108():77-95. PubMed ID: 21212850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of automated and partial coherence keratometry and resulting choice of toric IOL.
    Ale Magar JB; Cunningham F; Brian G
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Apr; 90(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 23435222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of keratometric measurements obtained by the Verion Image Guided System with optical biometry and auto-keratorefractometer.
    Asena L; Güngör SG; Akman A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 37(2):391-399. PubMed ID: 27271763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reproducibility of corneal astigmatism measurements with a hand held keratometer in preschool children.
    Harvey EM; Miller JM; Dobson V
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1995 Nov; 79(11):983-90. PubMed ID: 8534668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.