129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9536905)
1. Patient doses from standard and spiral CT of the head using a fast twin-beam system.
Seifert H; Hagen T; Bartylla K; Blass G; Piepgras U
Br J Radiol; 1997 Nov; 70(839):1139-45. PubMed ID: 9536905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of two methods for assessing patient dose from computed tomography.
Geleijns J; Van Unnik JG; Zoetelief J; Zweers D; Broerse JJ
Br J Radiol; 1994 Apr; 67(796):360-5. PubMed ID: 8173877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Dosage measurements in spiral CT examinations of the head and neck region].
Cohnen M; Cohnen B; Ewen K; Teubert G; Mödder U
Rofo; 1998 May; 168(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 9617364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Radiation exposure in single slice and multi-slice spiral CT (a phantom study)].
Giacomuzzi SM; Torbica P; Rieger M; Lottersberger C; Peer S; Peer R; Perkmann R; Buchberger W; Bale R; Mallouhi A; Jaschke W
Rofo; 2001 Jul; 173(7):643-9. PubMed ID: 11512238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automatic exposure control in pediatric and adult computed tomography examinations: can we estimate organ and effective dose from mean MAS reduction?
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Oikonomou I; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2011 Oct; 46(10):654-62. PubMed ID: 21673583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Total effective radiation dose from spiral CT and conventional radiography of the pelvis with regard to fracture classification.
Jurik AG; Jensen LC; Hansen J
Acta Radiol; 1996 Sep; 37(5):651-4. PubMed ID: 8915269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation doses in examination of lower third molars with computed tomography and conventional radiography.
Ohman A; Kull L; Andersson J; Flygare L
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Dec; 37(8):445-52. PubMed ID: 19033429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Saving dose in triple-rule-out computed tomography examination using a high-pitch dual spiral technique.
Sommer WH; Schenzle JC; Becker CR; Nikolaou K; Graser A; Michalski G; Neumaier K; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Feb; 45(2):64-71. PubMed ID: 20027121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbed doses from spiral CT and conventional spiral tomography: a phantom vs. cadaver study.
Bou Serhal C; Jacobs R; Gijbels F; Bosmans H; Hermans R; Quirynen M; van Steenberghe D
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Oct; 12(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 11564107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conventional spiral and low-dose computed mandibular tomography for dental implant planning.
Ekestubbe A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 1999; 138():1-82. PubMed ID: 10635103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Low-dosage dental CT].
Rustemeyer P; Streubühr U; Hohn HP; Rustemeyer R; Eich HT; John-Mikolajewski V; Müller RD
Rofo; 1999 Aug; 171(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 10506887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Radiation exposure of the head, midface and pelvis in multi-slice CT (MSCT): comparison with single-slice CT (SSCT)].
Wedegärtner U; Thurmann H; Schmidt R; Adam G
Rofo; 2003 Feb; 175(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 12584624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of z overscanning on radiation burden of pediatric patients undergoing head CT with multidetector scanners: a Monte Carlo study.
Tzedakis A; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2472-8. PubMed ID: 16898450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Radiation exposure during spiral-CT of the paranasal sinuses].
Dammann F; Momino-Traserra E; Remy C; Pereira PL; Baumann I; Koitschev A; Claussen CD
Rofo; 2000 Mar; 172(3):232-7. PubMed ID: 10778453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Assessment of the effective dose for routine protocols in conventional CT, electron beam CT and coronary angiography].
Becker C; Schätzl M; Feist H; Bäuml A; Schöpf UJ; Michalski G; Lechel U; Hengge M; Brüning R; Reiser M
Rofo; 1999 Jan; 170(1):99-104. PubMed ID: 10071653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of head size∕shape, miscentering, and bowtie filter on peak patient tissue doses from modern brain perfusion 256-slice CT: how can we minimize the risk for deterministic effects?
Perisinakis K; Seimenis I; Tzedakis A; Papadakis AE; Damilakis J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011911. PubMed ID: 23298102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of patient dose from imaging protocols for dental implant planning using conventional radiography and computed tomography.
Lecomber AR; Yoneyama Y; Lovelock DJ; Hosoi T; Adams AM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):255-9. PubMed ID: 11571544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of dose and risk to the body following conventional and spiral computed tomography.
Chang LL; Chen FD; Chang PS; Liu CC; Lien HL
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1995 Apr; 55(4):283-9. PubMed ID: 7796354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-dose spiral CT: applicability to paediatric chest imaging.
Rogalla P; Stöver B; Scheer I; Juran R; Gaedicke G; Hamm B
Pediatr Radiol; 1999 Aug; 29(8):565-9. PubMed ID: 10415177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation dose from cone beam computed tomography for image-guided radiation therapy.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Wong W; Lam N
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Jan; 70(1):272-9. PubMed ID: 17980510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
