These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9537145)
1. Clinical assessment of a hand-held automated keratometer in cataract surgery. Leyland M; Benjamin L Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():854-7. PubMed ID: 9537145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical comparison of automated and manual keratometry in pre-operative ocular biometry. Sunderraj P Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 1)():60-2. PubMed ID: 1426402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical utility of the Barrett keratoscope with astigmatic dial. Morlet N Ophthalmic Surg; 1994 Mar; 25(3):150-3. PubMed ID: 8196917 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting postoperative astigmatism using Scheimpflug keratometry (Pentacam) and automated keratometry (IOLMaster). Yong Park C; Do JR; Chuck RS Curr Eye Res; 2012 Dec; 37(12):1091-8. PubMed ID: 22916682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparability and repeatability of corneal astigmatism measurements using different measurement technologies. Visser N; Berendschot TT; Verbakel F; de Brabander J; Nuijts RM J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1764-70. PubMed ID: 22999600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The reproducibility of biometry and keratometry measurements. Butcher JM; O'Brien C Eye (Lond); 1991; 5 ( Pt 6)():708-11. PubMed ID: 1800171 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Nguyen NX; Kus MM; Küchle M Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):693-702. PubMed ID: 10201589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Precision of biometry, keratometry, and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry-keratometry device. Shammas HJ; Chan S J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1474-8. PubMed ID: 20692557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of corneal astigmatism and axis location in cataract patients measured by total corneal power, automated keratometry, and simulated keratometry. Srivannaboon S; Soeharnila ; Chirapapaisan C; Chonpimai P J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Dec; 38(12):2088-93. PubMed ID: 22985831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of two selective interrupted suture removal techniques for control of post keratoplasty astigmatism. Forster RK Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1997; 95():193-214; discussion 214-20. PubMed ID: 9440170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Relation between preoperative and late postoperative keratometry]. Pont'uchová E; Cernák A; Sisková E; Potocký M Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 1995 Apr; 51(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 8591616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of graft diameter on corneal power and the regularity of postkeratoplasty astigmatism before and after suture removal. Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Küchle M; Naumann GO Ophthalmology; 2003 Nov; 110(11):2162-7. PubMed ID: 14597524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Argon laser suturotomy: a technique for the correction of surgically induced astigmatism. Sachdev MS; Kumar H; Dada VK; Mehta MR; Jain AK Ophthalmic Surg; 1990 Apr; 21(4):277-81. PubMed ID: 2194146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Refractive results of successful penetrating keratoplasty, intraocular lens implantation with selective suture removal. Pradera I; Ibrahim O; Waring GO Refract Corneal Surg; 1989; 5(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 2488811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]