These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9537154)

  • 1. The validity of current clinical tests of contrast sensitivity and their ability to predict reading speed in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Woo GC
    Eye (Lond); 1997; 11 ( Pt 6)():893-9. PubMed ID: 9537154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing the reliability, discriminative ability, and validity of disability glare tests.
    Elliott DB; Bullimore MA
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1993 Jan; 34(1):108-19. PubMed ID: 8425818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The letter contrast sensitivity test: clinical evaluation of a new design.
    Haymes SA; Roberts KF; Cruess AF; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP; Ramsey MS; Chauhan BC; Artes PH
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Jun; 47(6):2739-45. PubMed ID: 16723494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical contrast sensitivity chart evaluation.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1992 Jul; 12(3):275-80. PubMed ID: 1454362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical assessment of two new contrast sensitivity charts.
    Thayaparan K; Crossland MD; Rubin GS
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 91(6):749-52. PubMed ID: 17166891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of Melbourne Edge Test contrast sensitivity measures in the visually impaired.
    Wolffsohn JS; Eperjesi F; Napper G
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jul; 25(4):371-4. PubMed ID: 15953123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of neodymium: YAG capsulotomy on contrast sensitivity and the evaluation of methods for its assessment.
    Tan JC; Spalton DJ; Arden GB
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Apr; 106(4):703-9. PubMed ID: 10201590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reading performance in patients with retinitis pigmentosa: a study using the MNREAD charts.
    Virgili G; Pierrottet C; Parmeggiani F; Pennino M; Giacomelli G; Steindler P; Menchini U; Orzalesi N;
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3418-24. PubMed ID: 15452044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of the contrast sensitivity card test for infants: retest variability and prediction of spatial resolution.
    Drover JR; Courage ML; Dalton SM; Adams RJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 83(4):228-32. PubMed ID: 16614578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of computer generated vision charts.
    Ehrmann K; Fedtke C; Radić A
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2009 Jun; 32(3):133-40. PubMed ID: 19362877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysics of reading. XV: Font effects in normal and low vision.
    Mansfield JS; Legge GE; Bane MC
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1996 Jul; 37(8):1492-501. PubMed ID: 8675391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart.
    Elliott DB; Sanderson K; Conkey A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1990 Jan; 10(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2330208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guidelines for predicting performance with low vision AIDS.
    Latham K; Tabrett DR
    Optom Vis Sci; 2012 Sep; 89(9):1316-26. PubMed ID: 22926113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of clinical acuity and contrast sensitivity charts: effect of uncorrected myopia.
    Bradley A; Hook J; Haeseker J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1991 Jul; 11(3):218-26. PubMed ID: 1766685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measuring contrast sensitivity under different lighting conditions: comparison of three tests.
    Bühren J; Terzi E; Bach M; Wesemann W; Kohnen T
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):290-8. PubMed ID: 16699441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysics of reading. Clinical predictors of low-vision reading speed.
    Legge GE; Ross JA; Isenberg LM; LaMay JM
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 Mar; 33(3):677-87. PubMed ID: 1544792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical impairment measures and reading performance in a large age-related macular degeneration group.
    Cacho I; Dickinson CM; Smith HJ; Harper RA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2010 May; 87(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 20386356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How useful are contrast sensitivity charts in optometric practice? Case reports.
    Elliott DB; Whitaker D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1992 May; 69(5):378-85. PubMed ID: 1594199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient's perceived visual disability.
    Elliott DB; Hurst MA; Weatherill J
    Eye (Lond); 1990; 4 ( Pt 5)():712-7. PubMed ID: 2282946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normative contrast sensitivity values for the back-lit Melbourne Edge Test and the effect of visual impairment.
    Eperjesi F; Wolffsohn J; Bowden J; Napper G; Rubinstein M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Nov; 24(6):600-6. PubMed ID: 15491489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.