These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9537154)

  • 21. Effects of spherical and astigmatic defocus on acuity and contrast sensitivity: a comparison of three clinical charts.
    Bradley A; Thomas T; Kalaher M; Hoerres M
    Optom Vis Sci; 1991 Jun; 68(6):418-26. PubMed ID: 1891193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A forced choice procedure for evaluation of contrast sensitivity function in preschool children.
    Richman JE; Lyons S
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1994 Dec; 65(12):859-64. PubMed ID: 7852704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual function, visual attention, and mobility performance in low vision.
    Leat SJ; Lovie-Kitchin JE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2008 Nov; 85(11):1049-56. PubMed ID: 18981920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed].
    Radner W; Willinger U; Obermayer W; Mudrich C; Velikay-Parel M; Eisenwort B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Sep; 213(3):174-81. PubMed ID: 9793916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improving the design of the letter contrast sensitivity test.
    Arditi A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jun; 46(6):2225-9. PubMed ID: 15914645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Binocular performance in patients with unilateral cataract using the Regan test: binocular summation and inhibition with low-contrast charts.
    Pardhan S
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():59-62. PubMed ID: 8325425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Binocular interaction in post-LASIK subjects with unsatisfactory outcome.
    Subramaniam SV
    Curr Eye Res; 2009 Dec; 34(12):1030-5. PubMed ID: 19958121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Clinical testing of contrast sensitivity in children: age-related norms and validity.
    Leat SJ; Wegmann D
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Apr; 81(4):245-54. PubMed ID: 15097766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Repeatability of the Waterloo Four-Contrast LogMAR Visual Acuity chart and Near Vision Test card on a group of normal young adults.
    Cho P; Woo GC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):427-35. PubMed ID: 15315657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [The influence of IOL implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity and colour vision 2 and 4 months after cataract surgery].
    Ventruba J
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2006 Apr; 62(2):133-43. PubMed ID: 16640052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Monocular versus binocular visual acuity as measures of vision impairment and predictors of visual disability.
    Rubin GS; Muñoz B; Bandeen-Roche K; West SK
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2000 Oct; 41(11):3327-34. PubMed ID: 11006221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Development of a reading speed test for potential-vision measurements.
    Elliott DB; Patel B; Whitaker D
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 Jul; 42(8):1945-9. PubMed ID: 11431465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Orientational contrast sensitivity and chromatic contrast thresholds in multiple sclerosis.
    Jackson TL; Ong GL; Ripley LG
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Feb; 137(2):283-6. PubMed ID: 14962418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Contrast reduction and reading: assessment and reliability with the Reading Explorer test.
    Giacomelli G; Volpe R; Virgili G; Farini A; Arrighi R; Tarli-Barbieri C; Mencucci R; Menchini U
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2010; 20(2):389-96. PubMed ID: 19882511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The practical near acuity chart (PNAC) and prediction of visual ability at near.
    Wolffsohn JS; Cochrane AL
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Mar; 20(2):90-7. PubMed ID: 10829130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. ETDRS-fast: implementing psychophysical adaptive methods to standardized visual acuity measurement with ETDRS charts.
    Camparini M; Cassinari P; Ferrigno L; Macaluso C
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1226-31. PubMed ID: 11328731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of the rate of contrast change on the quality of contrast sensitivity assessment: a comparison of three psychophysical methods.
    Nio YK; Jansonius NM; Lamers P; Mager A; Zeinstra J; Kooijman AC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2005 Jan; 25(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 15649179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Repeatability of reading ability indices in subjects with impaired vision.
    Subramanian A; Pardhan S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3643-7. PubMed ID: 19339738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluating Barten image metric for predicting character recognition in people with low vision.
    Schoessow KA; Mauney LM; Uslan M; Schuchard RA
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(10):1343-52. PubMed ID: 24699970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Assessment of mesopic and contrast vision for driving licences: which cut-off values, which methods are appropriate?].
    Wilhelm H; Peters T; Durst W; Roelcke S; Quast R; Hütten M; Wilhelm B
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2013 Nov; 230(11):1106-13. PubMed ID: 24190829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.