BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9539033)

  • 1. Biological effects of low-level exposures: a perspective from U.S. EPA scientists.
    Davis JM; Farland WH
    Environ Health Perspect; 1998 Feb; 106 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):379-81. PubMed ID: 9539033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
    Kavlock R; Dix D
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of potential risk levels associated with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency reference values.
    Castorina R; Woodruff TJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2003 Aug; 111(10):1318-25. PubMed ID: 12896853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Framework for metals risk assessment.
    Fairbrother A; Wenstel R; Sappington K; Wood W
    Ecotoxicol Environ Saf; 2007 Oct; 68(2):145-227. PubMed ID: 17889701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scientific issues in the U.S. EPA Framework for Metals Risk Assessment.
    Bradham K; Wentsel R
    J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2010; 73(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 20077282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's examination of its risk assessment principles and practices: a brief perspective from the regulated community.
    Stahl RG; Guiseppi-Elie A; Bingman TS
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Jan; 1(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 16637153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A lifestage approach to assessing children's exposure.
    Cohen Hubal EA; Moya J; Selevan SG
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 83(6):522-9. PubMed ID: 19025791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Human exposure assessment and public health.
    Sexton K
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 372():455-66. PubMed ID: 1956939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of threshold and mode of action in risk assessment.
    Crump KS
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 41(8):637-50. PubMed ID: 21718086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future direction of ecological risk assessment in the United States: reflecting on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's "Examination of risk assessment practices and principles".
    DeMott RP; Balaraman A; Sorensen MT
    Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2005 Jan; 1(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 16637151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comments on article "Applying mode-of-action and pharmacokinetic considerations in contemporary cancer risk assessments: an example with trichloroethylene" by Clewell and Andersen.
    Caldwell JC; Evans MV; Marcus AH; Scott CS; Chiu WA; Okino MS; Preuss PW
    Crit Rev Toxicol; 2006 Mar; 36(3):291-4; discussion 295-8. PubMed ID: 16686425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency procedures and policies to estimate risk of injury to the male reproductive system.
    Francis EZ
    Prog Clin Biol Res; 1989; 302():3-16; discussion 17-20. PubMed ID: 2755956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Low dose responses.
    Wilson R
    Risk Anal; 2000 Jun; 20(3):297-9. PubMed ID: 10949407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Evaluation (2001) of the EPA dioxin reassessment.
    Paustenbach DJ;
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Oct; 36(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 12460755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Risk assessment at the EPA: an agency self-exam.
    Schmidt CW
    Environ Health Perspect; 2004 Jun; 112(8):A482-5. PubMed ID: 15175195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A lifestage-specific approach to hazard and dose-response characterization for children's health risk assessment.
    Makris SL; Thompson CM; Euling SY; Selevan SG; Sonawane B
    Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2008 Dec; 83(6):530-46. PubMed ID: 19085945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The NAS perchlorate review: questions remain about the perchlorate RfD.
    Ginsberg G; Rice D
    Environ Health Perspect; 2005 Sep; 113(9):1117-9. PubMed ID: 16140613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Low-level toxicity of chemicals: No acceptable levels?
    Lanphear BP
    PLoS Biol; 2017 Dec; 15(12):e2003066. PubMed ID: 29257830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Advancing exposure characterization for chemical evaluation and risk assessment.
    Cohen Hubal EA; Richard A; Aylward L; Edwards S; Gallagher J; Goldsmith MR; Isukapalli S; Tornero-Velez R; Weber E; Kavlock R
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):299-313. PubMed ID: 20574904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Informing 21st-Century Risk Assessments with 21st-Century Science.
    Birnbaum LS; Burke TA; Jones JJ
    Environ Health Perspect; 2016 Apr; 124(4):A60-3. PubMed ID: 27035154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.