BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9539041)

  • 1. Seeking harmony in discord.
    Nicholson RH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1998; 28(1):7. PubMed ID: 9539041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Research ethics review in Australia, Europe and North America.
    McNeill PM
    IRB; 1989; 11(3):4-7. PubMed ID: 11650207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. More comment from Westminster.
    Dalyell T
    New Sci; 1998 Oct; 160(2154):55. PubMed ID: 11657258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Unity in diversity.
    Nicholson RH
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1999; 29(1):6. PubMed ID: 10052004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Issues for research ethics committees: third installment.
    Evans D; Crossland N; Graham I; Preece A
    Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Feb; No. 135():13-6. PubMed ID: 11657246
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The trouble with ethics committees.
    Meade TW
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1994; 28(2):102-4. PubMed ID: 7802766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local research ethics committees.
    Alberti KG
    BMJ; 1995 Sep; 311(7006):639-40. PubMed ID: 7549620
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The regulation of biomedical research experimentation in Canada: developing an effective apparatus for the implementation of ethical principles in a scientific milieu.
    Verdun-Jones S; Weisstub DN
    Ottawa Law Rev; 1996-1997; 28(2):297-341. PubMed ID: 11657290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Better research ethics committees: comments on guidance from the Department of Health and the European Community.
    Diamond AL; Laurence DR
    J R Coll Physicians Lond; 1993 Apr; 27(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 8501672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fees and research ethics committees.
    Pickworth E; Brazier M
    Bull Med Ethics; 1999 Oct; No. 151():18-20. PubMed ID: 11657986
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The ethics of research ethics committees.
    Nicholl J
    BMJ; 2000 Apr; 320(7243):1217. PubMed ID: 10784570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Proposal for a good clinical practice directive.
    European Commission
    Bull Med Ethics; 1998 Feb; No. 135():6-11. PubMed ID: 11657249
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical trials committees: how long is the protocol review and approval process in Spain? A prospective study.
    Ortega R; Dal-RĂ© R
    IRB; 1995; 17(4):6-9. PubMed ID: 11654218
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of local research ethics committees.
    Moodie P
    BMJ; 1992 May; 304(6835):1129-30. PubMed ID: 1392786
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ethical review of multi-centre research.
    Horwitz R
    Bull Med Ethics; 1994 Oct; No. 102():13-5. PubMed ID: 11654130
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Divide and rule.
    Nicholson RH
    IRB; 1992; 14(4):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651392
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical ethics committees?: a response.
    Tildsley GJ
    J Med Ethics; 2000 Aug; 26(4):289-90. PubMed ID: 11645766
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A national research ethics committee?
    Alderson P
    Bull Med Ethics; 1995 Apr; No. 107():13-6. PubMed ID: 11654315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Institutional review boards.
    Levine RJ
    BMJ; 1989 May; 298(6683):1268-9. PubMed ID: 2500193
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trends in the social control of medical and psychiatric research.
    Benson PR; Roth LH
    Law Ment Health; 1988; 4():1-47. PubMed ID: 11655151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.