142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9539046)
61. Respect for autonomy, advance directives, and minimally conscious state.
Varelius J
Bioethics; 2011 Nov; 25(9):505-15. PubMed ID: 20132191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. A letter from a patient's daughter.
Hansot E
Ann Intern Med; 1996 Jul; 125(2):149-51. PubMed ID: 8678372
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
63. Making treatment decisions for incapacitated older adults without advance directives. AGS Ethics Committee. American Geriatrics Society.
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1996 Aug; 44(8):986-7. PubMed ID: 8708314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
64. Improving advance directives: more dialogue, not more laws.
Sachs GA
J Clin Ethics; 1993; 4(2):171-3. PubMed ID: 8334282
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
65. Asking too much: autonomy and responsibility at the end of life.
Shepherd L
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2009; 26(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 20112619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. What should be done when a proxy is reluctant to carry out the wishes of an incompetent patient?
Gasner MR; Finley CD
J Clin Ethics; 1992; 3(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 1301840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
67. The Barnes case: taking difficult futility cases public.
Mickelsen RA; Bernstein DS; Marshall MF; Miles SH
J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(1):374-8. PubMed ID: 23581679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. The terminally ill patient: time to turn a new page.
Katz D; Da'as Nael ; Amiel S; Levy Y; Flaschner E
Isr Med Assoc J; 2014 Sep; 16(9):535-8. PubMed ID: 25351008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
69. Advance Directives: The Principle of Determining Authenticity.
Carter M
Hastings Cent Rep; 2022 Jan; 52(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 35143071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Futility, the Multiorganization Policy Statement, and the Schneiderman Response.
Fine RL
Perspect Biol Med; 2018; 60(3):358-366. PubMed ID: 29375065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. The quantifiability of medical futility.
Vinicky JK; Orlowski JP
J Clin Ethics; 1994; 5(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 7919486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
72. It's not optional.
Christopher M
Am J Bioeth; 2010 Apr; 10(4):1-2. PubMed ID: 20379909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
73. Understanding medical futility: two Texas cases illustrate the dilemmas for families, hospitals--and nurses.
Pfeifer GM; Kennedy MS
Am J Nurs; 2006 May; 106(5):25-6. PubMed ID: 16639239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
74. BMA division disagrees with association's stance over advance directives.
Jessiman IM
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):850-1. PubMed ID: 8608320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
75. The right to die or choosing not to live--a dilemma.
Rosen LF
Todays OR Nurse; 1993; 15(6):48. PubMed ID: 8291076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
76. A time to die.
Mackay MJ
Med J Aust; 2004 Dec 6-20; 181(11-12):667-8. PubMed ID: 15588205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
77. When a family questions a living will.
Durbin CR
Nurse Pract; 2011 Aug; 36(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 21768827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
78. What makes a directive valid?
Emanuel LL
Hastings Cent Rep; 1994; 24(6):S27-9. PubMed ID: 7860276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
79. Why no advance directive?
Weinryb J
Arch Intern Med; 1995 Mar; 155(5):547. PubMed ID: 7864714
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
80. Approaches and reflexions on advance healthcare directives in Brazil.
Hassegawa LCU; Rubira MC; Vieira SM; Rubira APA; Katsuragawa TH; Gallo JH; Nunes RML
Rev Bras Enferm; 2019; 72(1):256-264. PubMed ID: 30916293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]