155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9539516)
1. Laparoscopy versus laparotomy: an evaluation of adhesion formation after pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in a porcine model.
Chen MD; Teigen GA; Reynolds HT; Johnson PR; Fowler JM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Mar; 178(3):499-503. PubMed ID: 9539516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pelvic adhesion formation after pelvic lymphadenectomy: comparison between transperitoneal laparoscopy and extraperitoneal laparotomy in a porcine model.
Fowler JM; Hartenbach EM; Reynolds HT; Borner J; Carter JR; Carlson JW; Twiggs LB; Carson LF
Gynecol Oncol; 1994 Oct; 55(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 7959261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Comparison of transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: randomized experimental study].
Occelli B; Narducci F; Lanvin D; Coste E; Legoupils E; Castelain B; Querleu D
Ann Chir; 2000 Jan; 125(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 10921179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. De novo adhesions with extraperitoneal endosurgical para-aortic lymphadenectomy versus transperitoneal laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy: a randomized experimental study.
Occelli B; Narducci F; Lanvin D; Querleu D; Coste E; Castelain B; Gibon D; LeBlanc E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Sep; 183(3):529-33. PubMed ID: 10992169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and safety of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy: an experimental prospective randomized study.
Lanvin D; Elhage A; Henry B; Leblanc E; Querleu D; Delobelle-Deroide A
Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Oct; 67(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 9345361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Surgical complications comparing extraperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic aortic staging in early stage ovarian and endometrial cancer.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Bebia V; Hernández A; Gilabert-Estalles J; Franco-Camps S; de la Torre J; Segrist J; Chipirliu A; Cabrera S; Pérez-Benavente A; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Jan; 160(1):83-90. PubMed ID: 33160695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical outcome of extraperitoneal paraaortic lymph node dissections compared with transperitoneal approach in gynecologic cancer patients.
Morales S; Zapardiel I; Grabowski JP; Hernandez A; Diestro MD; Gonzalez-Benitez C; De Santiago J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2013; 20(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 23680520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecological cancers: feasibility, safety, and short-term outcomes of isolated and combined procedures.
Bats AS; Mimouni M; Bensaïd C; Seror J; Douay-Hauser N; Nos C; Lécuru F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2014 Oct; 24(8):1486-92. PubMed ID: 25191875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between transperitoneal and extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic malignancies.
Akladios C; Ronzino V; Schrot-Sanyan S; Afors K; Fernandes R; Baldauf JJ; Wattiez A
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):268-74. PubMed ID: 25460316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymph node dissection: development of a technique.
Vasilev SA; McGonigle KF
J Laparoendosc Surg; 1995 Apr; 5(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 7612948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical development and results of left extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer.
Dargent D; Ansquer Y; Mathevet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Apr; 77(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 10739695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Preliminary technique of laparoscopic extraperitoneal infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in the porcine model.
Atlas I; Sert MB; Childers JM
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1998 Aug; 5(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 9668151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectomies.
Köhler C; Klemm P; Schau A; Possover M; Krause N; Tozzi R; Schneider A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Oct; 95(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 15385110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Learning curves for transperitoneal laparoscopic and extraperitoneal endoscopic paraaortic lymphadenectomy.
Occelli B; Narducci F; Lanvin D; LeBlanc E; Querleu D
J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 2000 Feb; 7(1):51-3. PubMed ID: 10648739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Technique of pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy].
Sláma J; Kocián R
Ceska Gynekol; 2016; 81(4):253-264. PubMed ID: 27882746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A propensity score evaluation of single-port or multiport extraperitoneal para-aortic lymphadenectomy and the transperitoneal approach for gynecological cancers].
Naoura I; Laas E; Beytout C; Bendifallah S; Ballester M; Daraï E
Bull Cancer; 2016 Apr; 103(4):320-9. PubMed ID: 26920042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic paraaortic lymph node sampling in prone position: development of a technique.
Bannenberg JJ; Meijer DW; Klopper PJ
J Laparoendosc Surg; 1995 Feb; 5(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 7766928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic staging pelvic lymphadenectomy: extraperitoneal approach.
Das S
Semin Surg Oncol; 1996; 12(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 8685579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Transperitoneal Versus Extraperitoneal Laparoscopic Aortic Lymphadenectomy for Surgical Staging of Endometrial and Ovarian Cancer: The STELLA Trial.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Correa-Paris A; Pérez-Benavente A; Franco-Camps S; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera S; de la Torre J; Centeno C; Puig OP; Gil-Ibañez B; Colas E; Magrina J; Gil-Moreno A
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 23(9):2966-74. PubMed ID: 27098143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
