154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9539516)
21. Robotically assisted para-aortic lymphadenectomy: surgical results: a cohort study of 487 patients.
Hudry D; Ahmad S; Zanagnolo V; Narducci F; Fastrez M; Ponce J; Tucher E; Lécuru F; Conri V; Leguevaque P; Goffin F; Holloway RW; Lambaudie E;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Mar; 25(3):504-11. PubMed ID: 25628104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopy for extraperitoneal paraaortic lymphadenectomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Ibáñez B; Pérez-Benavente A; Martínez-Gómez X; Colás E; Sánchez-Iglesias JL; Cabrera-Díaz S; Puig-Puig O; Magrina JF; Gil-Moreno A
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 132(1):98-101. PubMed ID: 24231134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Safety and Feasibility Analysis of Laparoscopic Lymphadenectomy in Pelvic Gynecologic Malignancies: A Prospective Study.
Benito V; Romeu S; Esparza M; Carballo S; Arencibia O; Medina N; Lubrano A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Nov; 25(9):1704-10. PubMed ID: 26397158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection in the obese.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin DS; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Mar; 84(3):426-30. PubMed ID: 11855882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Learning curve and surgical outcome for robotic-assisted hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy: case-matched controlled comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer.
Lim PC; Kang E; Park DH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(6):739-48. PubMed ID: 20955983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Lomboaortic Lymphadenectomy in Gynecological Oncology: Laparotomy, Laparoscopy or Robot-Assisted Laparoscopy?
Kerbage Y; Kakkos A; Kridelka F; Lambaudie E; Bats AS; Hébert T; Goffin F; Wallet J; Leblanc E; Hudry D; Narducci F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Oct; 27(10):3891-3897. PubMed ID: 32472415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Carbon dioxide homeostasis during transperitoneal or extraperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy: a real-time intraoperative comparison.
Glascock JM; Winfield HN; Lund GO; Donovan JF; Ping ST; Griffiths DL
J Endourol; 1996 Aug; 10(4):319-23. PubMed ID: 8872727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Adhesion formation after transperitoneal nephrectomy: laparoscopic v open approach.
Moore RG; Partin AW; Adams JB; Kavoussi LR
J Endourol; 1995 Jun; 9(3):277-80. PubMed ID: 7550274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotically assisted laparoscopy for paraaortic lymphadenectomy: technical description and results of an initial experience.
Lambaudie E; Narducci F; Leblanc E; Bannier M; Jauffret C; Cannone F; Houvenaeghel G
Surg Endosc; 2012 Sep; 26(9):2430-5. PubMed ID: 22407151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A prospective, comparative study on robotic versus open-surgery hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy for endometrial carcinoma.
Eklind S; Lindfors A; Sjöli P; Dahm-Kähler P
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Feb; 25(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 25611898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robot-assisted laparoscopy versus laparotomy for infrarenal paraaortic lymphadenectomy in women with high-risk endometrial cancer: A randomised controlled trial.
Salehi S; Åvall-Lundqvist E; Legerstam B; Carlson JW; Falconer H
Eur J Cancer; 2017 Jul; 79():81-89. PubMed ID: 28463759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancers.
Kehoe SM; Abu-Rustum NR
Curr Treat Options Oncol; 2006 Mar; 7(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 16455020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Incidence of postoperative adhesion formation after transperitoneal genitourinary laparoscopic surgery.
Pattaras JG; Moore RG; Landman J; Clayman RV; Janetschek G; McDougall EM; Docimo SG; Parra RO; Kavoussi LR
Urology; 2002 Jan; 59(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 11796277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Extraperitoneal pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy.
Coptcoat MJ
Endosc Surg Allied Technol; 1995 Feb; 3(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 7757446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: laparotomy extraperitoneal, transperitoneal or laparoscopic approach? A randomized study.
Panici PB; Plotti F; Zullo MA; Muzii L; Manci N; Palaia I; Ruggiero A; Angioli R
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Dec; 103(3):859-64. PubMed ID: 16806442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies (I). Technique and results.
Lécuru F; Taurelle R
Surg Endosc; 1998 Jan; 12(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9419294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Intra-abdominal adhesion formation: does surgical approach matter? Questionnaire survey of South Asian surgeons and literature review.
Hackethal A; Sick C; Szalay G; Puntambekar S; Joseph K; Langde S; Oehmke F; Tinneberg HR; Muenstedt K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Oct; 37(10):1382-90. PubMed ID: 21599803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adhesion formation after intraperitoneal and extraperitoneal implantation of polypropylene mesh.
Farmer L; Ayoub M; Warejcka D; Southerland S; Freeman A; Solis M
Am Surg; 1998 Feb; 64(2):144-6. PubMed ID: 9486886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Extraperitoneal Endoscopic Total Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy: No Bowel Surgery.
Andou M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(4):475. PubMed ID: 26775911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Laparoscopic paraaortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer: a single-center experience.
Vázquez-Vicente D; Fernández Del Bas B; García Villayzán J; Di Fiore HA; Luna Tirado J; Casado Echarren V; García-Foncillas J; Plaza Arranz J; Chiva L
Clin Transl Oncol; 2018 Nov; 20(11):1455-1459. PubMed ID: 29671223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
