194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9539907)
1. Conventional Pap smears are unreliable.
Reid RI
Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):252. PubMed ID: 9539907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Increase Pap smear uptake.
Zardawi I
Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):252. PubMed ID: 9539906
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. PAPNET superior to rapid rescreening.
Wright RG
Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):253-4. PubMed ID: 9539909
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Screening the hard to reach: improving morbidity and mortality from cervical cancer in New Zealand.
Sykes P; Sadler L; Priest P
N Z Med J; 2008 Jul; 121(1277):5-7. PubMed ID: 18677325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Frequency and outcome of cervical cancer prevention failures in the United States.
Raab SS; Grzybicki DM; Zarbo RJ; Jensen C; Geyer SJ; Janosky JE; Meier FA; Vrbin CM; Carter G; Geisinger KR
Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Nov; 128(5):817-24. PubMed ID: 17951205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How not to organise a cervical screening programme.
Skegg DC
N Z Med J; 1989 Oct; 102(877):527-8. PubMed ID: 2797586
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The natural history of Pap test screening in a rural population.
Rosenfeld JA
Tenn Med; 1998 May; 91(5):179-82. PubMed ID: 9584605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Women have a right to the most accurate result.
Roberts JM; Bowditch R; Gurley AM; Laverty CR; Thurloe JK
Med J Aust; 1998 Mar; 168(5):252-3. PubMed ID: 9539908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pitfalls in the screening and early diagnosis of cervical cancer.
Wain GV; Hacker NF
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Feb; 2(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 2102310
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cervical screening.
Jones RW; Cox B; Fitzgerald N; Hill M; Jennings P; Peddie D; Sage M
N Z Med J; 1999 Feb; 112(1082):57. PubMed ID: 10091896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Screening for cervix uteri cancer].
Borràs JM; Iglesias X
Med Clin (Barc); 1994; 102 Suppl 1():80-4. PubMed ID: 8170254
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Stat bite: Frequency of cervical cancer screening by health plan, 2000-2003.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Dec; 96(23):1741. PubMed ID: 15572755
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Stat bite: Cancer screening for women.
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Feb; 99(4):271. PubMed ID: 17312303
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cervical smears.
Kashyap V; Murthy NS; Bhatnagar P; Sharma S; Das DK
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 1995 Oct; 38(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 9726147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Many unnecessary Pap smears are performed after hysterectomy.
J Fam Pract; 2004 Sep; 53(9):682, 685. PubMed ID: 15353152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for cervical cancer. Pap smears can save lives.
Wong JG; Feussner JR
N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):342-5. PubMed ID: 8350931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New cervical screening legislation: access to clinical records.
Lewis H
N Z Med J; 2004 Apr; 117(1191):U829. PubMed ID: 15107891
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Augmentation of Pap smear screening of high risk aboriginal women. Use of a computerised process tool within the Broome Aboriginal Medical Service.
Couzos S; Wronski I; Murray R; Cox H
Aust Fam Physician; 1998 Apr; 27(4):269-74. PubMed ID: 9581335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Epidemiologists and cervical screening.
Cox B
N Z Med J; 1987 Sep; 100(832):603-4. PubMed ID: 3452105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Interpretive yields of screening Pap tests and diagnostic Pap tests.
Stelow EB; Gulbahce HE; Kjeldahl K; Oprea GM; Savik K; Pambuccian SE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Dec; 31(6):427-9. PubMed ID: 15540184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
