BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9539943)

  • 1. 'Kickbacks'.
    Driver-Jowitt JP
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Jan; 88(1):56-7. PubMed ID: 9539943
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lucrative operation: how some doctors turn a $90 profit from a $17 test; physician groups add markup to work done by others, despite ethics concerns; administrative costs cited.
    Armstrong D
    Wall St J (East Ed); 2005 Sep; ():A1, A8. PubMed ID: 16224819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Keep conditional referral--let patient fees rule].
    Johansson B; Svederberg S
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Nov; 101(47):3827. PubMed ID: 15609541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fee splitting in veterinary practice.
    Emswiller BB
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Sep; 207(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 7657565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fee splitting.
    Hannah HW
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1988 Feb; 192(3):310-1. PubMed ID: 3356566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [An alternative to compulsory referral].
    Johansson B; Svederberg S
    Lakartidningen; 2005 Jan 3-16; 102(1-2):69; author reply 69. PubMed ID: 15707117
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chiropractic clinic offered referral kickbacks.
    Freedhoff Y
    CMAJ; 2010 Aug; 182(11):E522. PubMed ID: 20566729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Abolish compulsory referrals and raise the annual health care fee limit].
    Sjödin C
    Lakartidningen; 2004 Dec; 101(49):4053. PubMed ID: 15633353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Understanding financial conflicts of interest.
    Thompson DF
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Aug; 329(8):573-6. PubMed ID: 8336759
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How you can get burned taking HMO referrals.
    Fields RL
    Med Econ; 1981 Aug; 58(17):161, 165-6, 168. PubMed ID: 10252442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicaid practitioner abuses and excuses vs. counterstrategy of the New York City Health Department.
    Bellin LE; Kavaler F
    Am J Public Health; 1971 Nov; 61(11):2201-10. PubMed ID: 4939593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Opposed to fee splitting.
    Chastain CB
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 1995 Dec; 207(12):1544. PubMed ID: 7493886
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Proposed restrictions on physician referrals to clinical labs: important areas left unclarified.
    Cooney PE
    Healthspan; 1992 May; 9(5):3-7. PubMed ID: 10119529
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ethics in medicine and law: standards and conflicts.
    Norton ML
    Leg Med Annu; 1977; ():201-15. PubMed ID: 593037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finder's fees for research subjects.
    Lind SE
    N Engl J Med; 1990 Jul; 323(3):192-5. PubMed ID: 2362609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bioethics as commodity: does the exchange of money alter the nature of an ethics consultation?
    Elliott C
    J Nurs Adm; 1998 Oct; 28(10):8, 12. PubMed ID: 9787673
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Malpractice wars: brace yourself for a surge in premiums.
    Crane M
    Med Econ; 1999 Jul; 76(14):103-6, 111-2. PubMed ID: 10539626
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Corporate practice, fee splitting and referral fees.
    Hogan CE
    N Y State Dent J; 2008; 74(5):6-8. PubMed ID: 18982962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The doctor and his "fee" between ingratitude and submission].
    Nau JY
    Rev Med Suisse; 2016 Jan; 12(503):236-7. PubMed ID: 26939199
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Chaos at the cash register.
    Ridley-Smith R
    N Z Med J; 2010 Apr; 123(1313):97. PubMed ID: 20581903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.