These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9540092)
21. An in vitro comparison of 10 radiographic methods for working length estimation. Rushton VE; Shearer AC; Horner K; Czajka J Int Endod J; 1995 May; 28(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 8626199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems. Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of various digital processing algorithms on the measurement accuracy of endodontic file length. Kal BI; Baksi BG; Dündar N; Sen BH Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Feb; 103(2):280-4. PubMed ID: 17234548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. II. In vivo evaluation. Ellingsen MA; Hollender LG; Harrington GW J Endod; 1995 Oct; 21(10):516-20. PubMed ID: 8596074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interpretation of endodontic file lengths using RadioVisiography. Leddy BJ; Miles DA; Newton CW; Brown CE J Endod; 1994 Nov; 20(11):542-5. PubMed ID: 7643038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiovisiography versus conventional radiography for detection of small instruments in endodontic length determination. Part 1. In vitro evaluation. Ellingsen MA; Harrington GW; Hollender LG J Endod; 1995 Jun; 21(6):326-31. PubMed ID: 7673842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Measurement of the distance between the minor foramen and the anatomic apex by digital and conventional radiography. Melius B; Jiang J; Zhu Q J Endod; 2002 Feb; 28(2):125-6. PubMed ID: 11833685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of radiographic and electronical working length determination on palatal and mesio-buccal root canals of extracted upper molars. Krajczár K; Marada G; Gyulai G; Tóth V Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Aug; 106(2):e90-3. PubMed ID: 18554958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radiographic versus electronic root canal working length determination. Kqiku L; Städtler P Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):777-80. PubMed ID: 22484869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of combined digital imaging parameters on endodontic file measurements. de Oliveira ML; Pinto GC; Ambrosano GM; Tosoni GM J Endod; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1404-7. PubMed ID: 22980188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Sensitometric and clinical evaluation of a new F-speed dental X-ray film. Syriopoulos K; Velders XL; Sanderink GC; van Der Stelt PF Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Jan; 30(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 11175272 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of a digital measurement tool to estimate working length in endodontics. Lamus F; Katz JO; Glaros AG J Contemp Dent Pract; 2001 Feb; 2(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 12167941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Radiographic determination of canal length direct digital radiography versus conventional radiography. Hedrick RT; Dove SB; Peters DD; McDavid WD J Endod; 1994 Jul; 20(7):320-6. PubMed ID: 7996092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of caries detection with four storage phosphor systems and E-speed radiographs. Hintze H; Wenzel A; Frydenberg M Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 May; 31(3):170-5. PubMed ID: 12058264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of three intra-oral storage phosphor systems using subjective image quality. Kitagawa H; Farman AG; Scheetz JP; Brown WP; Lewis J; Benefiel M; Kuroyanagi K Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Sep; 29(5):272-6. PubMed ID: 10980561 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The use of high-resolution digital imaging technology for small diameter K-file length determination in endodontics. Vandenberghe B; Bud M; Sutanto A; Jacobs R Clin Oral Investig; 2010 Apr; 14(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 19452176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effects of imaging system and exposure on accurate detection of the second mesio-buccal canal in maxillary molar teeth. Ramamurthy R; Scheetz JP; Clark SJ; Farman AG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Dec; 102(6):796-802. PubMed ID: 17138184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Approximal caries depth assessment with storage phosphor versus film radiography. Evaluation of the caries-specific Oslo enhancement procedure. Svanaes DB; Moystad A; Larheim TA Caries Res; 2000; 34(6):448-53. PubMed ID: 11093017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of ambient light and bit depth of digital radiograph on observer performance in determination of endodontic file positioning. Heo MS; Han DH; An BM; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Lee SS; Choi SC Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):239-44. PubMed ID: 17604662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of radiographic measurements obtained with conventional and indirect digital imaging during endodontic treatment. Schmitd LB; Lima Tde C; Chinellato LE; Bramante CM; Garcia RB; de Moraes IG; Bernardineli N J Appl Oral Sci; 2008; 16(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 19089211 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]