These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9540316)
41. Effect of a self-adhesive coating on the load-bearing capacity of tooth-coloured restorative materials. Bagheri R; Palamara J; Mese A; Manton DJ Aust Dent J; 2017 Mar; 62(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 27224424 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of the effect of storage media on hardness and shear punch strength of tooth-colored restorative materials. Bagheri R; Tyas MJ; Burrow MF Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):329-34. PubMed ID: 17993032 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Strength and wear resistance of a dental glass-ionomer cement with a novel nanofilled resin coating. Lohbauer U; Krämer N; Siedschlag G; Schubert EW; Lauerer B; Müller FA; Petschelt A; Ebert J Am J Dent; 2011 Apr; 24(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 21698994 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage. Irie M; Suzuki K Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Flexural strength and surface microhardness of materials used for temporary dental disocclusion submitted to thermal cycling: An in vitro study. Borges de Lima T; Guilherme Neves J; Terossi de Godoi AP; Costa AR; Degan VV; Correr AB; Valdrighi HC Int Orthod; 2020 Sep; 18(3):519-527. PubMed ID: 32417201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. The physical properties of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer dental cements stored in saliva, proprietary acidic beverages, saline and water. McKenzie MA; Linden RW; Nicholson JW Biomaterials; 2003 Oct; 24(22):4063-9. PubMed ID: 12834602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Evaluation of a conventional glass ionomer cement with new zinc formulation: effect of coating, aging and storage agents. Zoergiebel J; Ilie N Clin Oral Investig; 2013 Mar; 17(2):619-26. PubMed ID: 22549662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Shear bond strength of resin-modified restorative glass-ionomer cements to dentin--an in vitro study. Arora R; Deshpande SD J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 1998 Dec; 16(4):130-3. PubMed ID: 10635141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Reinforcing effect of discontinuous microglass fibers on resin-modified glass ionomer cement. Garoushi S; Vallittu PK; Lassila L Dent Mater J; 2018 Jun; 37(3):484-492. PubMed ID: 29553125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Effects of aging and cyclic loading on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. Bapna MS; Gadia CM; Drummond JL Eur J Oral Sci; 2002 Aug; 110(4):330-4. PubMed ID: 12206596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. The effects of maturity and dehydration shrinkage on resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations. Sidhu SK; Sherriff M; Watson TF J Dent Res; 1997 Aug; 76(8):1495-501. PubMed ID: 9240386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. A comparison of the diametral tensile strength, the flexural strength, and the compressive strength of two new core materials to a silver alloy-reinforced glass-ionomer material. Levartovsky S; Kuyinu E; Georgescu M; Goldstein GR J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Nov; 72(5):481-5. PubMed ID: 7844747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. An evaluation of retention and marginal seating of Ni-Cr alloy cast restorations using three different luting cements: an in vitro study. Pattanaik BK; Nagda SJ Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22842244 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. In vitro wear of Ionofil Molar AC quick glass-ionomer cement. Abesi F; Safarcherati H; Sadati J; Kheirollahi H Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(5):731. PubMed ID: 22406725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin. Awliya WY; Akpata ES J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):290-4. PubMed ID: 10050116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparative study of the physical properties of core materials. Saygili G; Mahmali SM Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2002 Aug; 22(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12212682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Fluoride release/uptake from newer glass-ionomer cements used with the ART approach. Gao W; Smales RJ; Gale MS Am J Dent; 2000 Aug; 13(4):201-4. PubMed ID: 11763931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Comparative physico-mechanical characterization of new hybrid restorative materials with conventional glass-ionomer and resin composite restorative materials. Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Braem M; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G J Dent Res; 1997 Apr; 76(4):883-94. PubMed ID: 9126185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations. Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Yap AU; Tham SY; Zhu LY; Lee HK Oper Dent; 2002; 27(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 12022457 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]