These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9540578)

  • 1. Wide-diameter implants: overcoming problems.
    Sullivan D; Siddiqui A
    Dent Today; 1994 Oct; 13(10):50, 52-7. PubMed ID: 9540578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Effect of Dental Implant Collar Design on Crestal Bone Loss at 1 Year After Implant Placement.
    Randall EF; Abou-Arraj RV; Geurs N; Griffin R; Reddy M; Geisinger M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(2):165-173. PubMed ID: 30794252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bone gain and implant stabilization after poor primary and secondary implant. Stability: a report of two cases.
    Al-Juboori MJ; Abdulrahaman Sb; Hassan A
    Dent Implantol Update; 2012 Mar; 23(3):17-23. PubMed ID: 22432172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bone quality and the immediate loading of implants-critical aspects based on literature, research, and clinical experience.
    Romanos GE
    Implant Dent; 2009 Jun; 18(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 19509530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Peri-implant tissue and radiographic bone levels in the immediately restored single-tooth implant: a retrospective analysis.
    Degidi M; Nardi D; Piattelli A
    J Periodontol; 2008 Feb; 79(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 18251639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors associated with early and late failure of dental implants.
    Sakka S; Baroudi K; Nassani MZ
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2012 Nov; 3(4):258-61. PubMed ID: 22927130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bell M; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 20556253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
    Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of immediate or delayed loading following immediate placement of implants with a modified surface.
    Liñares A; Mardas N; Dard M; Donos N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jan; 22(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 21039892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of immediate loading on early bone healing at two-piece implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: an experimental study in the beagle dog.
    Blanco J; Mareque S; Liñares A; Pérez J; Muñoz F; Ramos I
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Apr; 40(4):421-9. PubMed ID: 23437989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An investigation of 131 consecutively placed wide screw-vent implants.
    Khayat PG; Hallage PG; Toledo RA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):827-32. PubMed ID: 11769833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of wide-diameter implants placed after dental extraction and implants positioned in mature bone for molar replacement.
    Peñarrocha-Diago M; Carrillo-Garcîa C; Boronat-Lopez A; García-Mira B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):497-501. PubMed ID: 18700374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implant insertional torque values predict outcomes.
    Walker LR; Morris GA; Novotny PJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 May; 69(5):1344-9. PubMed ID: 21398013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implants (3.3 mm diameter) for the rehabilitation of edentulous posterior regions: a retrospective clinical study with up to 11 years of follow-up.
    Maló P; de Araújo Nobre M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2011 Jun; 13(2):95-103. PubMed ID: 19681926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The esthetic dental implant: letting restoration be the guide.
    Garber DA
    J Oral Implantol; 1996; 22(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 8957890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Immediate placement of anatomically shaped dental implants.
    Coatoam GW; Mariotti A
    J Oral Implantol; 2000; 26(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11831317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new implant designed to maximize contact with trabecular bone: survival to 18 months.
    Morris HF; Winkler S; Ochi S; Kanaan A
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(4):164-73. PubMed ID: 12500874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Current status of dental implants: a periodontal perspective.
    Klokkevold PR; Newman MG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 10697940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Immediate provisionalization of single-tooth implants in fresh-extraction sites at the maxillary esthetic zone: up to 6 years of follow-up.
    Mijiritsky E; Mardinger O; Mazor Z; Chaushu G
    Implant Dent; 2009 Aug; 18(4):326-33. PubMed ID: 19667821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Initial stability of two dental implant systems: influence of buccolingual width and probe orientation on resonance frequency measurements.
    Tözüm TF; Turkyilmaz I; Bal BT
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 19438965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.