179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9540740)
1. A stabilized rubber dam clamp for cervical restorations: a case report.
Huband ML
Va Dent J; 1994; 71(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 9540740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alternative rubber dam isolation technique for the restoration of Class V cervical lesions.
Owens BM
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 16827034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A new technique for restoration of worn anterior teeth.
Christensen GJ
Oral Health; 1996 Mar; 86(3):25-7. PubMed ID: 8948237
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Soft tissue management for difficult cervical restorations.
Meraner M
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 16689068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Should a rubber dam be used with composite restorations?].
Roeters FJ
Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Aug; 106(8):311. PubMed ID: 12138863
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The rubber dam-retaining appliance: an adjunct to isolation during placement of multiple veneers.
Liebenberg WH
Quintessence Int; 1995 Jul; 26(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 8935035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An innovative method of cushioning metal clamp jaws during rubber dam isolation.
Liebenberg WH
J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Oct; 61(10):876-81. PubMed ID: 7497334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rubber dam isolation of cervical lesions. Part 1: Alternative techniques which avoid injury to the periodontium.
Liebenberg WH
FDI World; 1994; 3(5):17-8, 20, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 9552650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rubber dam isolation--key to success in diastema closure technique with direct composite resin.
Barros de Campos PR; Maia RR; Rodrigues de Menezes L; Barbosa IF; Carneiro da Cunha A; da Silveira Pereira GD
Int J Esthet Dent; 2015; 10(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 26794052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pin-retained restorations for severely worn posterior teeth.
Williamson R
Compendium; 1993 Nov; 14(11):1412, 1414, 1416 passim; quiz 1422. PubMed ID: 8620378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners.
Lynch CD; McConnell RJ
Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 17501755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical evaluation of a self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
Abdalla AI; El Sayed HY
Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 19024260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Restoration of cervical lesions: an update.
McLellan M
Hawaii Dent J; 1993 Apr; 24(4):10, 14. PubMed ID: 11816195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Restoration of a cervical lesion: etiology and factors affecting technique.
Trushkowsky RD
Dent Today; 1994 May; 13(5):82, 84-7. PubMed ID: 9540608
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rubber dam--the easy way.
Small BW
Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 10321148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Rubber dam clamp placement on partially erupted molars without anesthesia.
Tatel FS
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):73. PubMed ID: 10730294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of the rubber dam on proximal contact strengths.
Rau PJ; Pioch T; Staehle HJ; Dörfer CE
Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 16827018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical glass ionomer restorations: a clinical study.
Lawrence LG
Dent J; 1979 Feb; 45(2):58-9, 63. PubMed ID: 283016
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
