These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9540740)

  • 1. A stabilized rubber dam clamp for cervical restorations: a case report.
    Huband ML
    Va Dent J; 1994; 71(2):21-2. PubMed ID: 9540740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternative rubber dam isolation technique for the restoration of Class V cervical lesions.
    Owens BM
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):277-80. PubMed ID: 16827034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new technique for restoration of worn anterior teeth.
    Christensen GJ
    Oral Health; 1996 Mar; 86(3):25-7. PubMed ID: 8948237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Soft tissue management for difficult cervical restorations.
    Meraner M
    Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):117-20. PubMed ID: 16689068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Should a rubber dam be used with composite restorations?].
    Roeters FJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1999 Aug; 106(8):311. PubMed ID: 12138863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The rubber dam-retaining appliance: an adjunct to isolation during placement of multiple veneers.
    Liebenberg WH
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Jul; 26(7):493-500. PubMed ID: 8935035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An innovative method of cushioning metal clamp jaws during rubber dam isolation.
    Liebenberg WH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1995 Oct; 61(10):876-81. PubMed ID: 7497334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Rubber dam isolation of cervical lesions. Part 1: Alternative techniques which avoid injury to the periodontium.
    Liebenberg WH
    FDI World; 1994; 3(5):17-8, 20, 22 passim. PubMed ID: 9552650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rubber dam isolation--key to success in diastema closure technique with direct composite resin.
    Barros de Campos PR; Maia RR; Rodrigues de Menezes L; Barbosa IF; Carneiro da Cunha A; da Silveira Pereira GD
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2015; 10(4):564-74. PubMed ID: 26794052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pin-retained restorations for severely worn posterior teeth.
    Williamson R
    Compendium; 1993 Nov; 14(11):1412, 1414, 1416 passim; quiz 1422. PubMed ID: 8620378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Attitudes and use of rubber dam by Irish general dental practitioners.
    Lynch CD; McConnell RJ
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jun; 40(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 17501755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Clinical evaluation of a self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
    Abdalla AI; El Sayed HY
    Am J Dent; 2008 Oct; 21(5):327-30. PubMed ID: 19024260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of esthetic parameters of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials and a polyacid-modified resin composite in Class V cervical lesions.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Quintessence Int; 1999 Sep; 30(9):607-14. PubMed ID: 10765866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Restoration of cervical lesions: an update.
    McLellan M
    Hawaii Dent J; 1993 Apr; 24(4):10, 14. PubMed ID: 11816195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Restoration of a cervical lesion: etiology and factors affecting technique.
    Trushkowsky RD
    Dent Today; 1994 May; 13(5):82, 84-7. PubMed ID: 9540608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rubber dam--the easy way.
    Small BW
    Gen Dent; 1999; 47(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 10321148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rubber dam clamp placement on partially erupted molars without anesthesia.
    Tatel FS
    Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(1):73. PubMed ID: 10730294
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-year clinical performance of Class V resin-modified glass-lonomer and resin composite restorations.
    Brackett WW; Dib A; Brackett MG; Reyes AA; Estrada BE
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(5):477-81. PubMed ID: 14531590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of the rubber dam on proximal contact strengths.
    Rau PJ; Pioch T; Staehle HJ; Dörfer CE
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 16827018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical glass ionomer restorations: a clinical study.
    Lawrence LG
    Dent J; 1979 Feb; 45(2):58-9, 63. PubMed ID: 283016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.