These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

94 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9542413)

  • 1. Bacterial cell size and surface charge characteristics relevant to filter validation studies.
    Mittelman MW; Jornitz MW; Meltzer TH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1998; 52(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 9542413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Effect of the Volume Throughput and Maximum Flux of Low-Surface-Tension Fluids on Bacterial Penetration of 0.2 Micron-Rated Filters during Process-Specific Filter Validation Testing.
    Folmsbee M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(2):307-16. PubMed ID: 25868996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The significance of sieve-retention to the filter validation process.
    Meltzer TH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1995; 49(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 7552239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of membrane filtration for removal of diminutive bioburden organisms in pharmaceutical products and processes.
    Sundaram S; Auriemma M; Howard G; Brandwein H; Leo F
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1999; 53(4):186-201. PubMed ID: 10754712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benchmarking of Sterilizing-Grade Filter Membranes with Liposome Filtration.
    Singh B; Mundlamuri R; Friese T; Mundrigi A; Handt S; Loewe T
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2018; 72(3):223-235. PubMed ID: 29242392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Microbial retention characteristics of 0.2-microns-rated nylon membrane filters during filtration of high viscosity fluids at high differential pressure and varied temperatures.
    Aranha H; Meeker J
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1995; 49(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 7780747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validation of sterilizing grade filtration.
    Jornitz MW; Meltzer TH
    Dev Biol (Basel); 2003; 113():65-9. PubMed ID: 14620854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sterilizing filtration of liposome and related lipid-containing solutions: enhancing successful filter qualification.
    Folmsbee M; Moussourakis M
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2012; 66(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 22492601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sorption of bacterial endotoxin and retention of bacteria by positively charged membrane filters.
    van Doorne H
    J Parenter Sci Technol; 1993; 47(5):192-8. PubMed ID: 8263658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Importance of Accurate Microorganism Identification in Microbial Challenge Tests of Membrane Filters. Part II. The Comparison of Hydrogenophaga pseudoflava ATTC 33668 and Curvibacter sp. ATCC 700892 by Microbial Challenge Tests with Membrane Filters.
    Haake G; Kaesler-Neumann I; Hennig H; Meltzer TH; Jornitz MW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2012; 66(4):346-53. PubMed ID: 22767883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Filter validation: bacterial hydrophobicity, adsorptive sequestration and cell size alteration.
    Mittelman MW; Kawamura K; Jornitz MW; Meltzer TH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):422-8. PubMed ID: 11766826
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of recovery filters for use in bacterial retention testing of sterilizing-grade filters.
    Carter J
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1996; 50(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 8696777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The importance of accurate microorganism identification in microbial challenge tests of membrane filters--part I.
    Kaesler I; Haake G; Hennig H; Rosenhagen A; Meltzer TH; Jornitz MW
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2011; 65(2):92-9. PubMed ID: 21502070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Retention and removal of pathogenic bacteria in wastewater percolating through porous media: a review.
    Stevik TK; Aa K; Ausland G; Hanssen JF
    Water Res; 2004 Mar; 38(6):1355-67. PubMed ID: 15016513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing the Filtration of Liposomes Using Sterilizing-Grade Filters.
    Zourna K; Iwaniec A; Turner S; Jackson NB; Welsh JH
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2021; 75(2):128-140. PubMed ID: 32999077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modified Bundle of Capillaries Approximation of Sterilizing Filter Membranes and its use for Filter Characterization and Filtration Process Optimization.
    Zakrewsky M; Hoopes P
    J Pharm Sci; 2022 Feb; 111(2):382-394. PubMed ID: 34600942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part III: bacterial challenge tests on 0.2/0.22 and 0.1 micron rated filter cartridges with Hydrogenophaga (formerly Pseudomonas) pseudoflava.
    Sundaram S; Eisenhuth J; Lewis M; Howard G; Brandwein H
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2001; 55(6):393-416. PubMed ID: 11766824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Membrane filtration of pharmaceutical solutions.
    McKinnon BT; Avis KE
    Am J Hosp Pharm; 1993 Sep; 50(9):1921-36. PubMed ID: 8135243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Method for qualifying microbial removal performance of 0.1 micron rated filters. Part IV: Retention of hydrogenophaga pseudoflava (ATCC 700892) and Ralstonia pickettii (ATCC 700591) by 0.2 and 0.22 micron rated filters.
    Sundaram S; Lewis M; Eisenhuth J; Howard G; Larson B
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2002; 56(3):150-71. PubMed ID: 12109335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.