These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9542487)

  • 1. Fetal vibro-acoustic stimulation with a can--a clinical study.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie TA; de Jager M; da Ponte A
    S Afr Med J; 1998 Feb; 88(2 Suppl):199-200, 203. PubMed ID: 9542487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical study on detecting false non-reactive of non-stress test by improved acoustic stimulation.
    Xi Q; Du J; Liu X; Shao L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):271-4. PubMed ID: 20677022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Primary care fetal assessment--low-cost fetal arousal testing.
    Hofmeyr GJ; Lawrie T; de Jager M
    S Afr Med J; 1997 Feb; 87(2):171-2. PubMed ID: 9107224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Vibro-acoustic stimulation in high-risk pregnancies; maternal perception of fetal movements, fetal heart rate and fetal outcome.
    Nyman M; Arulkumaran S; Jakobsson J; Westgren M
    J Perinat Med; 1992; 20(4):267-74. PubMed ID: 1432550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Short fetal acoustic stimulation test for rapid antepartum assessment of fetal well-being.
    Tannirandorn Y; Kittipibul V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2001 Apr; 84(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 11460963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antepartum fetal wellbeing.
    Chutiwongse S; Tannirandorn Y; Sukcharoen N; Witoonpanich P; Snidvongs W; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1991 May; 74(5):257-63. PubMed ID: 1783873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Clinical evaluation of antepartum vibratory acoustic stimulation test].
    Chen BJ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1991 Mar; 26(2):71-4, 123. PubMed ID: 1860368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuing experience with the fetal acoustic stimulation test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Nguyen HN; Jacobs N; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Apr; 33(4):365-8. PubMed ID: 3367338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing. III. Predictive value of a reactive test.
    Smith CV; Phelan JP; Broussard P; Paul RH
    J Reprod Med; 1988 Feb; 33(2):217-8. PubMed ID: 3351822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of the effects of acoustic stimulation and feeding mother stimulation on non-reactive non-stress test: a randomized clinical trial.
    Hasanpour S; Raouf S; Shamsalizadeh N; Bani S; Ghojazadeh M; Sheikhan F
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Jun; 287(6):1105-10. PubMed ID: 23329342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Does Doppler-detected fetal movement decrease the incidence of nonreactive nonstress tests?
    Stanco LM; Rabello Y; Medearis AL; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Dec; 82(6):999-1003. PubMed ID: 8233279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The fetal acoustic stimulation test: a reliable and cost effective method of antepartum fetal monitoring.
    Batcha TM; Goonewardene IM
    Ceylon Med J; 2005 Dec; 50(4):156-9. PubMed ID: 16538910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prognostic value of cardiotocographic acoustic test in post-term pregnancies.
    Skretek M; Bielecki M; Zdanowicz A; Zabielan H
    Ann Med Univ Bialyst Pol; 1993; 38(1):79-85. PubMed ID: 7922491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A critical appraisal of fetal acoustic stimulation as an antenatal test for fetal well-being.
    Romero R; Mazor M; Hobbins JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 May; 71(5):781-6. PubMed ID: 3282196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of fetal well-being using the nonstress test in the home setting.
    Naef RW; Morrison JC; Washburne JF; McLaughlin BN; Perry KG; Roberts WE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 84(3):424-6. PubMed ID: 8058242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The startle test revisited.
    Miller JM; Rodriguez A; Gabert HA
    J Perinatol; 2004 Jul; 24(7):421-2. PubMed ID: 15152272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Does fetal reaction to vibro-acoustic stimulation depend on its activity state?].
    Berclaz G; Herrmann U
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1991; 31(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 1916523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of maternal perception of sound-provoked fetal movement as a test of antenatal fetal health.
    Arulkumaran S; Anandakumar C; Wong YC; Ratnam SS
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Feb; 73(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 2911425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring.
    Goonewardene M; Hanwellage K
    Ceylon Med J; 2011 Mar; 56(1):14-8. PubMed ID: 21542428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Evaluation of fetal well-being by vibro-acoustic stimulation test].
    Sun DW; Chen XX; Gai MY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1994 Jun; 29(6):322-4, 380. PubMed ID: 8001402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.