These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9544148)

  • 1. Breaking strength and diameter of absorbable sutures after in vivo exposure in the rat.
    Outlaw KK; Vela AR; O'Leary JP
    Am Surg; 1998 Apr; 64(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 9544148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Maxon suture with Vicryl, chromic catgut, and PDS sutures in fascial closure in rats.
    Sanz LE; Patterson JA; Kamath R; Willett G; Ahmed SW; Butterfield AB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1988 Mar; 71(3 Pt 1):418-22. PubMed ID: 3126470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparative evaluation of tensile strength of absorbable threads Dexon and Maxon. Experimental studies].
    Kulak Z; Deja A; Tuszewski M
    Polim Med; 1991; 21(1-2):43-8. PubMed ID: 1667692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-vivo comparison of four absorbable sutures: Vicryl, Dexon Plus, Maxon and PDS.
    Bourne RB; Bitar H; Andreae PR; Martin LM; Finlay JB; Marquis F
    Can J Surg; 1988 Jan; 31(1):43-5. PubMed ID: 2827875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. In vivo and in vitro degradation of monofilament absorbable sutures, PDS and Maxon.
    Metz SA; Chegini N; Masterson BJ
    Biomaterials; 1990 Jan; 11(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 2105750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Knotting abilities of a new absorbable monofilament suture: poliglecaprone 25 (Monocryl).
    Trimbos JB; Niggebrugge A; Trimbos R; Van Rijssel EJ
    Eur J Surg; 1995 May; 161(5):319-22. PubMed ID: 7662774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Strength retention of chromic gut and monofilament synthetic absorbable suture materials in joint tissues.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1989 May; (242):303-10. PubMed ID: 2495876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical performance of polyglycolic acid and polyglactin 910 synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Rodeheaver GT; Thacker JG; Edlich RF
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1981 Dec; 153(6):835-41. PubMed ID: 6272438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Strength retention of chromic gut and synthetic absorbable sutures in a nonhealing synovial wound.
    Walton M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Jun; (267):294-8. PubMed ID: 1904335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantitative evaluation of stiffness of commercial suture materials.
    Chu CC; Kizil Z
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 168(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 2919353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical comparison of 10 suture materials before and after in vivo incubation.
    Greenwald D; Shumway S; Albear P; Gottlieb L
    J Surg Res; 1994 Apr; 56(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 8152233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [In vivo investigations on suture reactions under sterile and not sterile conditions. Comparison of absorbable and nonabsorbable suture materials (author's transl)].
    Thiede A; Lünstedt B
    Zentralbl Chir; 1979; 104(9):568-81. PubMed ID: 525088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A new synthetic monofilament absorbable suture made from polytrimethylene carbonate.
    Katz AR; Mukherjee DP; Kaganov AL; Gordon S
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1985 Sep; 161(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 3898441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Synthetic resorbable and synthetic non-resorbable suture materials in microvascular surgery. Animal experimental study].
    Dahlke H; Dociu N; Thurau K
    Handchirurgie; 1979; 11(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 393576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The resistance of absorbable sutures in fetal tissue and fluids.
    Aktuğ T
    Turk J Pediatr; 1989; 31(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 2518585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of human urine on the tensile strength of sutures used for hypospadias surgery.
    Kerstein RL; Sedaghati T; Seifalian AM; Kang N
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2013 Jun; 66(6):835-8. PubMed ID: 23558021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Knot integrity as a function of suture expiration.
    Muffly TM; Baquero P; Bonham AJ
    J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 21292212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A biologic comparison of polyglactin 910 and polyglycolic acid synthetic absorbable sutures.
    Craig PH; Williams JA; Davis KW; Magoun AD; Levy AJ; Bogdansky S; Jones JP
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1975 Jul; 141(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1154207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of human pancreatic juice and bile on the tensile strength of suture materials.
    Muftuoglu MA; Ozkan E; Saglam A
    Am J Surg; 2004 Aug; 188(2):200-3. PubMed ID: 15249253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures.
    Debus ES; Geiger D; Sailer M; Ederer J; Thiede A
    Eur Surg Res; 1997; 29(1):52-61. PubMed ID: 9013106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.