350 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9544195)
1. Comparative studies of the mutagenicity of environmental tobacco smoke from cigarettes that burn or primarily heat tobacco.
Bombick BR; Avalos JT; Nelson PR; Conrad FW; Doolittle DJ
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1998; 31(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 9544195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mutagenicity of native cigarette mainstream smoke and its gas/vapour phase by use of different tester strains and cigarettes in a modified Ames assay.
Aufderheide M; Gressmann H
Mutat Res; 2008 Oct; 656(1-2):82-7. PubMed ID: 18721897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toxicologic evaluation of licorice extract as a cigarette ingredient.
Carmines EL; Lemus R; Gaworski CL
Food Chem Toxicol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):1303-22. PubMed ID: 15878225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Environmental tobacco smoke: comparative characterization by mutagenicity assays of sidestream and mainstream cigarette smoke.
Löfroth G; Lazaridis G
Environ Mutagen; 1986; 8(5):693-704. PubMed ID: 3533527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of smoking conditions and methods of collection on the mutagenicity and cytotoxicity of cigarette mainstream smoke.
Rickert WS; Trivedi AH; Momin RA; Wright WG; Lauterbach JH
Toxicol Sci; 2007 Apr; 96(2):285-93. PubMed ID: 17189562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The mutagenic assessment of an electronic-cigarette and reference cigarette smoke using the Ames assay in strains TA98 and TA100.
Thorne D; Crooks I; Hollings M; Seymour A; Meredith C; Gaca M
Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen; 2016 Dec; 812():29-38. PubMed ID: 27908385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A modified Ames assay reveals the mutagenicity of native cigarette mainstream smoke and its gas vapour phase.
Aufderheide M; Gressmann H
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2007 Aug; 58(6):383-92. PubMed ID: 17555953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative study of DNA adduct formation in mice following inhalation of smoke from cigarettes that burn or primarily heat tobacco.
Brown BG; Lee CK; Bombick BR; Ayres PH; Mosberg AT; Doolittle DJ
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1997; 29(3):303-11. PubMed ID: 9142174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The mouse lymphoma thymidine kinase assay for the assessment and comparison of the mutagenic activity of cigarette mainstream smoke particulate phase.
Schramke H; Meisgen TJ; Tewes FJ; Gomm W; Roemer E
Toxicology; 2006 Oct; 227(3):193-210. PubMed ID: 16963170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Statistical analysis of in vitro data for risk assessment - exemplified for a case of Ames test data.
Roller M; Aufderheide M
Exp Toxicol Pathol; 2008 Jun; 60(2-3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18396021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) evaluation of a third-generation electrically heated cigarette smoking system (EHCSS).
Frost-Pineda K; Zedler BK; Liang Q; Roethig HJ
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2008 Nov; 52(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 18639603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of a novel tobacco process on the in vitro cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of cigarette smoke particulate matter.
Combes R; Scott K; Dillon D; Meredith C; McAdam K; Proctor C
Toxicol In Vitro; 2012 Sep; 26(6):1022-9. PubMed ID: 22542757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An overview of the effects of tobacco ingredients on smoke chemistry and toxicity.
Baker RR; Massey ED; Smith G
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004; 42 Suppl():S53-83. PubMed ID: 15072838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Toxic volatile organic compounds in simulated environmental tobacco smoke: emission factors for exposure assessment.
Daisey JM; Mahanama KR; Hodgson AT
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol; 1998; 8(3):313-34. PubMed ID: 9679214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative study of smoke condensates from 1R4F cigarettes that burn tobacco versus ECLIPSE cigarettes that primarily heat tobacco in the SENCAR mouse dermal tumor promotion assay.
Meckley DR; Hayes JR; Van Kampen KR; Ayres PH; Mosberg AT; Swauger JE
Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 May; 42(5):851-63. PubMed ID: 15046832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the mainstream smoke chemistry and mutagenicity of a representative sample of the US cigarette market with two Kentucky reference cigarettes (K1R4F and K1R5F).
Chepiga TA; Morton MJ; Murphy PA; Avalos JT; Bombick BR; Doolittle DJ; Borgerding MF; Swauger JE
Food Chem Toxicol; 2000 Oct; 38(10):949-62. PubMed ID: 11039328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative studies on the genotoxic activity of mainstream smoke condensate from cigarettes which burn or only heat tobacco.
Doolittle DJ; Lee CK; Ivett JL; Mirsalis JC; Riccio E; Rudd CJ; Burger GT; Hayes AW
Environ Mol Mutagen; 1990; 15(2):93-105. PubMed ID: 2407532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Bacterial mutagenicity of cigarette smoke and its interaction with ethanol.
De Flora S; Balansky R; Gasparini L; Camoirano A
Mutagenesis; 1995 Jan; 10(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 7739401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of cigarette filters on the chemical composition and in vitro biological activity of cigarette mainstream smoke.
Shin HJ; Sohn HO; Han JH; Park CH; Lee HS; Lee DW; Hwang KJ; Hyun HC
Food Chem Toxicol; 2009 Jan; 47(1):192-7. PubMed ID: 19027817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of filtration by activated charcoal on the toxicological activity of cigarette mainstream smoke from experimental cigarettes.
Gaworski CL; Schramke H; Diekmann J; Meisgen TJ; Tewes FJ; Veltel DJ; Vanscheeuwijck PM; Rajendran N; Muzzio M; Haussmann HJ
Inhal Toxicol; 2009 Jul; 21(8):688-704. PubMed ID: 19555222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
