These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9544371)

  • 1. A randomized study of local or general anesthesia for laser conization of the cervix.
    Stefanidis K; Paschopoulos M; Dusias B; Adonakis G; Lolis D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1998; 261(2):75-8. PubMed ID: 9544371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conization of the cervix with the CO2 laser as an office procedure.
    Indman PD
    J Reprod Med; 1985 May; 30(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 4009561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Electrosurgical loop excision of the cervical transformation zone: the experience of family physicians.
    Ferris DG; Hainer BL; Pfenninger JL; Zuber TJ; DeWitt DE; Line RL
    J Fam Pract; 1995 Oct; 41(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 7561706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Laser conization and laser ablation of the transformation zone].
    Kieni S; Rageth JC
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2000; 40(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 10867494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [LASER CONISATION VS. COLD KNIFE CONISATION FOR CIN].
    Karagyozov I
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2016; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27514128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison between loop diathermy conization and cold-knife conization for management of cervical dysplasia associated with unsatisfactory colposcopy.
    Oyesanya OA; Amerasinghe C; Manning EA
    Gynecol Oncol; 1993 Jul; 50(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 8349168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Outpatient cervical conization with the CO2 laser.
    Iversen T
    J Reprod Med; 1985 Aug; 30(8):607-9. PubMed ID: 4045834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cervical conization: cold knife and laser excision in residency training.
    Delmore J; Horbelt DV; Kallail KJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 Jun; 79(6):1016-9. PubMed ID: 1579298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) with colposcopic biopsy and efficacy of loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP).
    Duesing N; Schwarz J; Choschzick M; Jaenicke F; Gieseking F; Issa R; Mahner S; Woelber L
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Dec; 286(6):1549-54. PubMed ID: 22865036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of office loop electrosurgical conization and cold knife conization.
    Saidi MH; Setzler FD; Sadler RK; Farhart SA; Akright BD
    J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc; 1994 Feb; 1(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 9050476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia treated with minimal conization by carbon dioxide laser.
    Békássy Z
    Lasers Surg Med; 1997; 20(4):461-6. PubMed ID: 9142687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of CO2 laser conization of the uterine cervix on pathologic interpretation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
    Fowler JM; Davos I; Leuchter RS; Lagasse LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1992 May; 79(5 ( Pt 1)):693-8. PubMed ID: 1565350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CO2 laser conization versus conventional conization: a clinico-pathologic appraisal.
    Meandzija MP; Locher G; Jackson JD
    Lasers Surg Med; 1984; 4(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 6472026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic significance of high-risk HPV persistence after laser CO2 conization for high-grade CIN: a prospective clinical study.
    Fallani MG; Penna C; Marchionni M; Bussani C; Pieralli A; Andersson KL; Fambrini M
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2008; 29(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 18714574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conization using electrosurgical conization and cold coagulation for international federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IA1 squamous cell carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
    Lee SJ; Kim WY; Lee JW; Kim HS; Choi YL; Ahn GH; Lee JH; Kim BG; Bae DS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2009 Apr; 19(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 19407568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. One-step management of cervical lesions.
    Darwish A; Gadallah H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Jun; 61(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 9688487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Diagnostic and therapeutic conization using loop radiothermal cautery.
    Saidi MH; Akright BD; Setzler FD; Sadler RK; Farhart SA
    J Reprod Med; 1993 Oct; 38(10):775-9. PubMed ID: 8263866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia positive cutting edge after conization].
    Dai ZQ; Pan LY; Huang HF
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2007 Feb; 29(2):153-4. PubMed ID: 17645859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Clinical efficacy of a new method for LEEP conization with pistol-shaped electroknife].
    Kovachev S; Nacheva A; Atanassova V; Piperkova N; Kostov I; Vasilev N
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2010; 49(5):20-5. PubMed ID: 21268398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laser conization versus cold knife conization.
    Larsson G; Alm P; Grundsell H
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1982 Jan; 154(1):59-61. PubMed ID: 7053590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.