BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

251 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9544511)

  • 1. Three approaches to regression analysis of receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous test results.
    Pepe MS
    Biometrics; 1998 Mar; 54(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 9544511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Model checking for ROC regression analysis.
    Cai T; Zheng Y
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):152-63. PubMed ID: 17447940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Semi-parametric ROC regression analysis with placement values.
    Cai T
    Biostatistics; 2004 Jan; 5(1):45-60. PubMed ID: 14744827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The analysis of placement values for evaluating discriminatory measures.
    Pepe MS; Cai T
    Biometrics; 2004 Jun; 60(2):528-35. PubMed ID: 15180681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A marginal model approach for analysis of multi-reader multi-test receiver operating characteristic (ROC) data.
    Song X; Zhou XH
    Biostatistics; 2005 Apr; 6(2):303-12. PubMed ID: 15772108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [On statistical evaluation of efficacy for dichotomous test result].
    Galassi G
    Clin Ter; 2006; 157(4):387-91. PubMed ID: 17051977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Transformation-invariant and nonparametric monotone smooth estimation of ROC curves.
    Du P; Tang L
    Stat Med; 2009 Jan; 28(2):349-59. PubMed ID: 18985706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Review of the new methodology of analyzing receiver operating characteristic curves.
    Ikeda M; Ishigaki T; Yamauchi K
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():837-40. PubMed ID: 10384578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semiparametric estimation of time-dependent ROC curves for longitudinal marker data.
    Zheng Y; Heagerty PJ
    Biostatistics; 2004 Oct; 5(4):615-32. PubMed ID: 15475423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of correlated ROC areas in diagnostic testing.
    Song HH
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):370-82. PubMed ID: 9147602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Survival model predictive accuracy and ROC curves.
    Heagerty PJ; Zheng Y
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):92-105. PubMed ID: 15737082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A permutation test sensitive to differences in areas for comparing ROC curves from a paired design.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(18):2873-93. PubMed ID: 16134144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Advanced integrated technique in breast cancer thermography.
    Ng EY; Kee EC
    J Med Eng Technol; 2008; 32(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 17852648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A permutation test for comparing ROC curves in multireader studies a multi-reader ROC, permutation test.
    Bandos AI; Rockette HE; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):414-20. PubMed ID: 16554220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A procedure for determining whether a simple combination of diagnostic tests may be noninferior to the theoretical optimum combination.
    Jin H; Lu Y
    Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(6):909-16. PubMed ID: 18556633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian bootstrap estimation of ROC curve.
    Gu J; Ghosal S; Roy A
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(26):5407-20. PubMed ID: 18613217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
    Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A modified sign test for comparing paired ROC curves.
    Braun TM; Alonzo TA
    Biostatistics; 2008 Apr; 9(2):364-72. PubMed ID: 17925302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.