277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9544542)
1. Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect's dentition.
Sweet D; Bowers CM
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Mar; 43(2):362-7. PubMed ID: 9544542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays.
Sweet D; Parhar M; Wood RE
J Forensic Sci; 1998 Sep; 43(5):1050-5. PubMed ID: 9729824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison between five commonly used two-dimensional methods of human bite mark overlay production from the dental study casts.
Maloth S; Ganapathy KS
Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(3):493. PubMed ID: 22048597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 2; "SCIP" and bite marks in skin and foodstuffs.
Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):26-32. PubMed ID: 9227071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quantitative forensic evaluation of bite marks with the aid of a shape analysis computer program: Part 1; The development of "SCIP" and the similarity index.
Nambiar P; Bridges TE; Brown KA
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1995 Dec; 13(2):18-25. PubMed ID: 9227070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bite mark analysis and comparison using image perception technology.
van der Velden A; Spiessens M; Willems G
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 16783951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Computer-based production of comparison overlays from 3D-scanned dental casts for bite mark analysis.
Martin-de las Heras S; Valenzuela A; Ogayar C; Valverde AJ; Torres JC
J Forensic Sci; 2005 Jan; 50(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 15831006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of a bitemark using clear acrylic replicas of the suspect's dentition--a case report.
McKenna CJ; Haron MI; Taylor JA
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1999 Dec; 17(2):40-3. PubMed ID: 10709562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparative study between xerographic, computer-assisted overlay generation and animated-superimposition methods in bite mark analyses.
Tai MW; Chong ZF; Asif MK; Rahmat RA; Nambiar P
Leg Med (Tokyo); 2016 Sep; 22():42-8. PubMed ID: 27591538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison between direct and indirect methods available for human bite mark analysis.
Kouble RF; Craig GT
J Forensic Sci; 2004 Jan; 49(1):111-8. PubMed ID: 14979355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Comparison of bite marks and teeth features using 2D and 3D methods].
Lorkiewicz-Muszyńska D; Glapiński M; Zaba C; Łabecka M
Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2011; 61(2):107-14. PubMed ID: 22390125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Analysis of bite marks].
Spiessens M; Van der Velden B; Willems G
Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2005; 60(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 16370436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental study of bite mark injuries by digital analysis.
Santoro V; Lozito P; De Donno A; Introna F
J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):224-8. PubMed ID: 20681963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Bitemarks in chocolate: a case report.
McKenna CJ; Haron MI; Brown KA; Jones AJ
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2000 Jun; 18(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 11324087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lack of dental uniqueness between two bite mark suspects.
Pretty IA; Turnbull MD
J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1487-91. PubMed ID: 11714165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bitemarks in forensic odontology.
Atsü SS; Gökdemir K; Kedici PS; Ikyaz YY
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Dec; 16(2):30-4. PubMed ID: 10425961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [An experimental study on human bitemarks digital analysis and its accuracy].
Wu Y; Chen X; Sun D
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Oct; 22(5):918-21. PubMed ID: 16294721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Computer-based method of bite mark analysis: A benchmark in forensic dentistry?
Pallam NK; Boaz K; Natrajan S; Raj M; Manaktala N; Lewis AJ
J Forensic Dent Sci; 2016; 8(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 27051221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Forensic dentistry: 2. Bitemarks and bite injuries.
Pretty IA
Dent Update; 2008; 35(1):48-50, 53-4, 57-8 passim. PubMed ID: 18277695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Yet another method for marking incisal edges of teeth for bitemark analysis.
Metcalf RD
J Forensic Sci; 2008 Mar; 53(2):426-9. PubMed ID: 18366575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
