These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

277 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9544542)

  • 41. Digital bite mark overlays--an analysis of effectiveness.
    Pretty IA; Sweet D
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Nov; 46(6):1385-91. PubMed ID: 11714149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bite mark documentation and analysis: the forensic 3D/CAD supported photogrammetry approach.
    Thali MJ; Braun M; Markwalder TH; Brueschweiler W; Zollinger U; Malik NJ; Yen K; Dirnhofer R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2003 Aug; 135(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 12927412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Good bite mark evidence: a case report.
    James H
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2006 Jun; 24(1):12-3. PubMed ID: 16783950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. GrinLine identification using digital imaging and Adobe Photoshop.
    Bollinger SA; Brumit PC; Schrader BA; Senn DR
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 Mar; 54(2):422-7. PubMed ID: 19187451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Accuracy of 3D scanners in tooth mark analysis.
    Molina A; Martin-de-las-Heras S
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan; 60 Suppl 1():S222-6. PubMed ID: 25388960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Effect of systematic dental shape modification in bitemarks.
    Holtkötter H; Sheets HD; Bush PJ; Bush MA
    Forensic Sci Int; 2013 May; 228(1-3):61-9. PubMed ID: 23597741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Image editing and computer assisted bitemark analysis: a case report.
    Wood RE; Miller PA; Blenkinsop BR
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Dec; 12(2):30-6. PubMed ID: 9227063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A comparative study of three commonly used two-dimensional overlay generation methods in bite mark analysis.
    Pajnigara NG; Balpande AS; Motwani MB; Choudhary A; Thakur S; Pajnigara NG
    J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2017; 21(3):442-446. PubMed ID: 29391724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The use of human skin in the fabrication of a bite mark template: two case reports.
    West MH; Barsley RE; Frair J; Seal MD
    J Forensic Sci; 1990 Nov; 35(6):1477-85. PubMed ID: 2262782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. [Assignment of a bite-mark on the victim's skin to the dentition of the perpetrator by means of anomalies in the number and position of the frontal teeth].
    Friedrich RE; Scheuer HA; Schulz F
    Arch Kriminol; 2005; 215(1-2):11-7. PubMed ID: 15757212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Forensic odontology, part 4. Human bite marks.
    Hinchliffe J
    Br Dent J; 2011 Apr; 210(8):363-8. PubMed ID: 21509016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of bitemarks in foodstuffs by computer imaging: a case report.
    Aboshi H; Taylor JA; Takei T; Brown KA
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1994 Dec; 12(2):41-4. PubMed ID: 9227065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A framework for estimating probability of a match in forensic bite mark identification.
    Tuceryan M; Li F; Blitzer HL; Parks ET; Platt JA
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S83-9. PubMed ID: 20887354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A survey of the incidence of missing anterior teeth: potential value in bite mark analysis.
    Kouble RF; Craig GT
    Sci Justice; 2007 May; 47(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 18572728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An elliptical incised wound of the breast misinterpreted as a bite injury.
    Sperry K; Campbell HR
    J Forensic Sci; 1990 Sep; 35(5):1226-35. PubMed ID: 2230696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparison of space analysis evaluations with digital models and plaster dental casts.
    Leifert MF; Leifert MM; Efstratiadis SS; Cangialosi TJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):16.e1-4; discussion 16. PubMed ID: 19577140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison between incisal embrasures of natural and prosthetically restored maxillary anterior teeth.
    Baharav H; Kupershmit I; Oman M; Cardash H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 19231573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Application Status and Prospect of Bite Mark Evidence in Forensic Odontology.
    Ma XF; Jin M; Sun H; Mi CB
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 36(3):369-373. PubMed ID: 32705852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Human bite marks in forensic dentistry.
    Wright FD; Dailey JC
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):365-97. PubMed ID: 11370460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Digital dental radiographic identification in the pediatric, mixed and permanent dentitions.
    Wood RE; Kirk NJ; Sweet DJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Sep; 44(5):910-6. PubMed ID: 10486940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.