246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9545878)
21. Microleakage of Class V restorations using two different compomer systems: an in vitro study.
Estafan D; Pines MS; Erakin C; Fuerst PF
J Clin Dent; 1999; 10(4):124-6. PubMed ID: 10825860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites.
Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Influence of bonded amalgam restorations on the fracture strength of teeth.
Oliveira JP; Cochran MA; Moore BK
Oper Dent; 1996; 21(3):110-5. PubMed ID: 9002870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner.
Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP
Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dentinal bond strengths and microleakage of a 4-META adhesive to amalgam and composite resin.
Cooley RL; Tseng EY; Barkmeier WW
Quintessence Int; 1991 Dec; 22(12):979-83. PubMed ID: 1813915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dentin adhesive superior to copal varnish in preventing microleakage in primary teeth.
Royse MC; Ott NW; Mathieu GP
Pediatr Dent; 1996; 18(7):440-3. PubMed ID: 8970205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of amalgam microleakage with a 4-META liner and copal varnish.
Moore DS; Johnson WW; Kaplan I
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(5):461-6. PubMed ID: 8595104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
Owens BM
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of a resin lining and rebonding on the marginal leakage of amalgam restorations.
Dutton FB; Summitt JB; Chan DC; Garcia-Godoy F
J Dent; 1993 Feb; 21(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8425985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of retentiveness of amalgam bonding agent types.
Winkler MM; Moore BK; Allen J; Rhodes B
Oper Dent; 1997; 22(5):200-8. PubMed ID: 9484142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Long-term monitoring of microleakage of different amalgams with different liners.
Gallato A; Angnes G; Reis A; Loguercio AD
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):571-6. PubMed ID: 15942619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Microleakage in primary teeth restored by conventional or bonded amalgam technique.
Myaki SI; Rodrigues CR; Raggio DP; Flores TA; Matson MR
Braz Dent J; 2001; 12(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 11696918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Microleakage of ceramic inlays luted with different resin cements and dentin adhesives.
Uludag B; Ozturk O; Ozturk AN
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Oct; 102(4):235-41. PubMed ID: 19782826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Fluoride-releasing resin bonding of amalgam restorations in primary teeth: in vitro secondary caries effect.
Hicks J; Milano M; Seybold S; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C
Am J Dent; 2002 Dec; 15(6):361-4. PubMed ID: 12691270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Assessing microleakage in resin composite restorations rebonded with a surface sealant and three low-viscosity resin systems.
Ramos RP; Chinelatti MA; Chimello DT; Dibb RG
Quintessence Int; 2002 Jun; 33(6):450-6. PubMed ID: 12073726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Microleakage of Class II box-type composite restorations.
Opdam NJ; Roeters JJ; Burgersdijk RC
Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):160-4. PubMed ID: 10388369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. In vitro microleakage of luting cements and crown foundation material.
Lindquist TJ; Connolly J
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar; 85(3):292-8. PubMed ID: 11264938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents.
Alavi AA; Kianimanesh N
Oper Dent; 2002; 27(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11817466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage.
Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV
Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
Santini A; Mitchell S
Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
