These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9545897)

  • 1. Cavosurface margin geometry in conventional and air abrasion Class V cavity preparations.
    Boston DW; Alperstein KS; Boberick K
    Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 9545897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of cutting patterns produced with air-abrasion systems using different tip designs.
    Santos-Pinto L; Peruchi C; Marker VA; Cordeiro R
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(3):308-12. PubMed ID: 11357575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scanning electron micrographic effects of air-abrasion cavity preparation on human enamel and dentin.
    Laurell KA; Hess JA
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7568724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Kinetic cavity preparation: protection of the cavo-surface enamel.
    Goto G; Zhang Y
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 9161209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of cavosurface margin configuration of Class V cavity preparations on microleakage of composite resin restorations.
    Bagheri M; Ghavamnasiri M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 Feb; 9(2):122-9. PubMed ID: 18264534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Replacement of resin-based composite: evaluation of cavity design, cavity depth, and shade matching.
    Gordan VV; Mondragon E; Shen C
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Apr; 33(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 11989376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polymerization contraction stresses of resin-based composite restorations within beveled cavity preparations of Class I restorations.
    Kinomoto Y; Torii M; Takeshige F; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 12797575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of grooves on resistance form of conservative Class 2 amalgams.
    Summitt JB; Howell ML; Burgess JO; Dutton FB; Osborne JW
    Oper Dent; 1992; 17(2):50-6. PubMed ID: 1437687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Kinetic cavity preparation effects on secondary caries formation around resin restorations: a polarized light microscopic in vitro evaluation.
    Hicks MJ; Parkins FM; Flaitz CM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(2):115-21, 80, 142. PubMed ID: 11475686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation of dental amalgam to the cavosurface margin of Class I cavity preparations.
    Symons AL; Wing G; Hewitt GH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Jan; 14(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 3469378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of tooth preparation on microleakage behavior.
    von Fraunhofer JA; Adachi EI; Barnes DM; Romberg E
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 11203866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning.
    Stavridakis MM; Krejci I; Magne P
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 16382598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Extension for prevention: is it relevant today?
    Osborne JW; Summitt JB
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):189-96. PubMed ID: 10388375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional cavity preparations for glass-ionomer restorations in primary molars: one-year results.
    Yip HK; Smales RJ; Yu C; Gao XJ; Deng DM
    Quintessence Int; 2002 Jan; 33(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 11887531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro evaluation of margins of replaced resin-based composite restorations.
    Gordan VV
    J Esthet Dent; 2000; 12(4):209-15. PubMed ID: 11323864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.