These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. Strength estimation of different designs of ceramic inlays and onlays in molars based on the Tsai-Wu failure criterion. Dejak B; Mlotkowski A; Romanowicz M J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):89-100. PubMed ID: 17692590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The direct resin onlay technique. Abel MG Dent Today; 2006 Jan; 25(1):84, 86-7. PubMed ID: 16471403 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. A 4- to 6-year retrospective clinical study of cracked teeth restored with bonded indirect resin composite onlays. Signore A; Benedicenti S; Covani U; Ravera G Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(6):609-16. PubMed ID: 18069370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fracture load of fixed partial dentures anchored by composite inlays. Ohlmann BM; Schmitter M; Gabbert O; Rammelsberg P Am J Dent; 2007 Dec; 20(6):405-10. PubMed ID: 18269134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical tips for improved composite resin inlays. Small BW Gen Dent; 2002; 50(5):412-4. PubMed ID: 12448891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Practical experiences with the Isosit inlay/onlay material]. Bischoff H Dent Labor (Munch); 1991 Mar; 39(3):341-6. PubMed ID: 1860531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A 5-year clinical study of indirect and direct resin composite and ceramic inlays. Thordrup M; Isidor F; Hörsted-Bindslev P Quintessence Int; 2001 Mar; 32(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12066659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. In vitro evaluation of microleakage of indirect composite inlays cemented with four luting agents. Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Loos-Ayav C; Jacquot B; Panighi MM J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jun; 93(6):563-70. PubMed ID: 15942618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Ceramic inlays and onlays]. van Pelt AW; de Kloet HJ; van der Kuy P Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1996 Nov; 103(11):472-6. PubMed ID: 11921995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The direct and indirect tempered inlay/onlay: restoration of the '90s. Plotka RT Dent Today; 1991 Oct; 10(8):62-3. PubMed ID: 1815668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Interfacial gaps following ceramic inlay cementation vs direct composites. Iida K; Inokoshi S; Kurosaki N Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 12877431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirect-composite and ceramic inlay systems. Soares CJ; Martins LR; Pfeifer JM; Giannini M Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 15119713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Achieving predictable results with posterior inlays and onlays. Howard NY Dent Today; 1996 May; 15(5):76, 78, 80-1. PubMed ID: 9567875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Color stability of three composite resins used in the inlay/onlay technique. Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E Scand J Dent Res; 1990 Jun; 98(3):257-60. PubMed ID: 2349452 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of box preparation on the strength of glass fiber-reinforced composite inlay-retained fixed partial dentures. Ozcan M; Breuklander MH; Vallittu PK J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Apr; 93(4):337-45. PubMed ID: 15798684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]