These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9545948)

  • 1. A comparison of molar root canal preparations using six instruments and instrumentation techniques.
    Roig-Cayón M; Basilio-Monné J; Abós-Herrándiz R; Brau-Aguadé E; Canalda-Sahli C
    J Endod; 1997 Jun; 23(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 9545948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The quality of apical canal preparation using hand and rotary instruments with specific criteria for enlargement based on initial apical file size.
    Tan BT; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2002 Sep; 28(9):658-64. PubMed ID: 12236311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparative study of root canal preparation using Profile .04 and Lightspeed rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Versümer J; Hülsmann M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Jan; 35(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 11853237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative study of six rotary nickel-titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation.
    Guelzow A; Stamm O; Martus P; Kielbassa AM
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):743-52. PubMed ID: 16164689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficiency of rotary nickel-titanium K3 instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-Flexofile. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
    Schäfer E; Schlingemann R
    Int Endod J; 2003 Mar; 36(3):208-17. PubMed ID: 12657147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study.
    Paqué F; Balmer M; Attin T; Peters OA
    J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 20307747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing apical preparations of root canals shaped by nickel-titanium rotary instruments and nickel-titanium hand instruments.
    Deplazes P; Peters O; Barbakow F
    J Endod; 2001 Mar; 27(3):196-202. PubMed ID: 11487151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of cutting efficiency and instrumentation of curved canals with nickel-titanium and stainless-steel instruments.
    Schäfer E; Lau R
    J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):427-30. PubMed ID: 10530244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of root canal preparations using Ni-Ti hand, Ni-Ti engine-driven, and K-Flex endodontic instruments.
    Glossen CR; Haller RH; Dove SB; del Rio CE
    J Endod; 1995 Mar; 21(3):146-51. PubMed ID: 7561658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quality of preparation of oval distal root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium instruments.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Mühge M; Schäfers F
    Int Endod J; 2002 Nov; 35(11):919-28. PubMed ID: 12453021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of stainless steel and nickel-titanium instruments in molar root canal preparation.
    Samyn JA; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
    J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):177-81. PubMed ID: 8935015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of stainless steel hand and rotary nickel-titanium instrumentation using a silicone impression technique.
    Chen JL; Messer HH
    Aust Dent J; 2002 Mar; 47(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 12035951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of root canal preparation using Flex Master Ni-Ti and Endo-Eze AET stainless steel instruments.
    Nordmeyer S; Schnell V; Hülsmann M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):251-9. PubMed ID: 21167758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Histological evaluation of the effectiveness of five instrumentation techniques for cleaning the apical third of root canals.
    Siqueira JF; Araújo MC; Garcia PF; Fraga RC; Dantas CJ
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):499-502. PubMed ID: 9587319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of canal centering ability of four instrumentation techniques.
    Short JA; Morgan LA; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1997 Aug; 23(8):503-7. PubMed ID: 9587320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of molar root canal preparation using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium instruments.
    Carvalho LA; Bonetti I; Borges MA
    J Endod; 1999 Dec; 25(12):807-10. PubMed ID: 10726526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison among manual instruments and PathFile and Mtwo rotary instruments to create a glide path in the root canal preparation of curved canals.
    Alves Vde O; Bueno CE; Cunha RS; Pinheiro SL; Fontana CE; de Martin AS
    J Endod; 2012 Jan; 38(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 22152634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The shaping effects of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments on preparing curved canals in posterior teeth.
    Wei X; Ling J; Zhang S
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2002 Sep; 37(5):333-5. PubMed ID: 12425841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR
    J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.