These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9547502)

  • 1. Lithium borate TLD for determining the backscatter factors for low-energy x rays: comparison with chamber-based and Monte Carlo derived values.
    Coudin D; Marinello G
    Med Phys; 1998 Mar; 25(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 9547502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation of backscatter factors for kilovoltage x-rays: a comparison between Monte Carlo simulations and Gafchromic EBT film measurements.
    Kim J; Hill R; Claridge Mackonis E; Kuncic Z
    Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(3):783-97. PubMed ID: 20071763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
    Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dosimetry of MammoSite® applicator: comparison between Monte Carlo simulation, measurements, and treatment planning calculation.
    Oshaghi M; Sadeghi M; Mahdavi SR; Shirazi A
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2013; 9(2):224-9. PubMed ID: 23771363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Addendum to the IPEMB code of practice for the determination of absorbed dose for x-rays below 300 kV generating potential (0.035 mm Al-4 mm Cu HVL).
    Aukett RJ; Burns JE; Greener AG; Harrison RM; Moretti C; Nahum AE; Rosser KE;
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(12):2739-48. PubMed ID: 15930599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Energy dependence of new thermoluminescent detectors in terms of HP(10) values.
    Miljanić S; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Ranogajec-Komor M; Krpan K; Vekić B
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 14690327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monte Carlo simulation studies of backscatter factors in mammography.
    Chan HP; Doi K
    Radiology; 1981 Apr; 139(1):195-9. PubMed ID: 7208922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Monte Carlo study of the quality dependence factors of common TLD materials in photon and electron beams.
    Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2015-32. PubMed ID: 9725586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurement of backscatter factors for low energy radiotherapy (0.1-2.0 mm Al HVL) using thermoluminescence dosimetry.
    Harrison RM; Walker C; Aukett RJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1990 Sep; 35(9):1247-54. PubMed ID: 2236206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Using LiF:Mg,Cu,P TLDs to estimate the absorbed dose to water in liquid water around an 192Ir brachytherapy source.
    Lucas PA; Aubineau-Lanièce I; Lourenço V; Vermesse D; Cutarella D
    Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011711. PubMed ID: 24387503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative study of LiF:Mg,Cu,Na,Si and Li2B4O7:Cu,Ag,P TL detectors.
    Miljanić S; Ranogajec-Komor M; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Prokić M
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):191-6. PubMed ID: 16709712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The quality dependence of LiF TLD in megavoltage photon beams: Monte Carlo simulation and experiments.
    Mobit PN; Mayles P; Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Mar; 41(3):387-98. PubMed ID: 8778821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An investigation of entrance surface dose calculations for diagnostic radiology using Monte Carlo simulations and radiotherapy dosimetry formalisms.
    Omrane LB; Verhaegen F; Chahed N; Mtimet S
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jun; 48(12):1809-24. PubMed ID: 12870585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perturbation effects in dosimetry: Part I. Kilovoltage x-rays and electrons.
    Nahum AE
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Sep; 41(9):1531-80. PubMed ID: 8884898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A Monte Carlo study of the quality dependence of diamond thermoluminescent dosimeters in radiotherapy beams.
    Mobit PN; Nahum AE; Mayles P
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Oct; 42(10):1913-27. PubMed ID: 9364587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Backscatter factors and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for diagnostic radiology dosimetry.
    Benmakhlouf H; Bouchard H; Fransson A; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7179-204. PubMed ID: 22024474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields.
    Fartaria MJ; Reis C; Pereira J; Pereira MF; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Oliveira C; Holovey V; Pascoal A; Alves JG
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6384-99. PubMed ID: 27499104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of calculations to validate beam quality and relative dose measurements for a kilovoltage X-ray therapy unit.
    Healy BJ; Hill RF
    Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Jun; 45(2):537-546. PubMed ID: 35381970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of the energy-response factor of LiF and Al2O3 in radiotherapy beams.
    Mobit P; Agyingi E; Sandison G
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):497-9. PubMed ID: 16735558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.