These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9547717)

  • 1. Bioanalytical calibration curves: proposal for statistical criteria.
    Kimanani EK
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1998 Feb; 16(6):1117-24. PubMed ID: 9547717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioanalytical calibration curves: variability of optimal powers between and within analytical methods.
    Kimanani EK; Lavigne J
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 1998 Feb; 16(6):1107-15. PubMed ID: 9547716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A new approach to evaluate regression models during validation of bioanalytical assays.
    Singtoroj T; Tarning J; Annerberg A; Ashton M; Bergqvist Y; White NJ; Lindegardh N; Day NP
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2006 Apr; 41(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 16332425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression - a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate.
    Motulsky HJ; Brown RE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 7():123. PubMed ID: 16526949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Selecting the correct weighting factors for linear and quadratic calibration curves with least-squares regression algorithm in bioanalytical LC-MS/MS assays and impacts of using incorrect weighting factors on curve stability, data quality, and assay performance.
    Gu H; Liu G; Wang J; Aubry AF; Arnold ME
    Anal Chem; 2014 Sep; 86(18):8959-66. PubMed ID: 25157966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Introduction to calibration curves in bioanalysis.
    Brewer E; Bollin E
    Bioanalysis; 2009 Oct; 1(7):1201-8. PubMed ID: 21083046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Simple Approach to Determine a Curve Fitting Model with a Correct Weighting Function for Calibration Curves in Quantitative Ligand Binding Assays.
    Xiang Y; Donley J; Seletskaia E; Shingare S; Kamerud J; Gorovits B
    AAPS J; 2018 Mar; 20(3):45. PubMed ID: 29536273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linear regression for calibration lines revisited: weighting schemes for bioanalytical methods.
    Almeida AM; Castel-Branco MM; Falcão AC
    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci; 2002 Jul; 774(2):215-22. PubMed ID: 12076691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standardisation of data from real-time quantitative PCR methods - evaluation of outliers and comparison of calibration curves.
    Burns MJ; Nixon GJ; Foy CA; Harris N
    BMC Biotechnol; 2005 Dec; 5():31. PubMed ID: 16336641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new method for identification of outliers in immunogenicity assay cut point data.
    Zhang J; Arends RH; Kubiak RJ; Roskos LK; Liang M; Lee N; Chen CC; Yang H
    J Immunol Methods; 2020; 484-485():112817. PubMed ID: 32615125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Novel Strategy for Large-Scale Metabolomics Study by Calibrating Gross and Systematic Errors in Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry.
    Zhao Y; Hao Z; Zhao C; Zhao J; Zhang J; Li Y; Li L; Huang X; Lin X; Zeng Z; Lu X; Xu G
    Anal Chem; 2016 Feb; 88(4):2234-42. PubMed ID: 26757347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kurtosis provides a good omnibus test for outliers in small samples.
    Livesey JH
    Clin Biochem; 2007 Sep; 40(13-14):1032-6. PubMed ID: 17499683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An expression of uncertainty in calibration using stepwise or separate dilution of a stock solution.
    Hayashi Y; Matsuda R
    Anal Sci; 2006 Jun; 22(6):889-94. PubMed ID: 16772691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Direct quantification in bioanalytical LC-MS/MS using internal calibration via analyte/stable isotope ratio.
    Nilsson LB; Eklund G
    J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2007 Feb; 43(3):1094-9. PubMed ID: 17084056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust cross-validation of linear regression QSAR models.
    Konovalov DA; Llewellyn LE; Vander Heyden Y; Coomans D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Oct; 48(10):2081-94. PubMed ID: 18826208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precision limits and interval estimation in the calibration of 1-hydroxypyrene in urine and hexachlorbenzene in water, applying the regression triplet procedure on chromatographic data.
    Meloun M; Dluhosová Z
    Anal Bioanal Chem; 2008 Apr; 390(7):1899-910. PubMed ID: 18264698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quantitation of 35S promoter in maize DNA extracts from genetically modified organisms using real-time polymerase chain reaction, part 2: interlaboratory study.
    Feinberg M; Fernandez S; Cassard S; Bertheau Y
    J AOAC Int; 2005; 88(2):558-73. PubMed ID: 15859084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Appropriate calibration curve fitting in ligand binding assays.
    Findlay JW; Dillard RF
    AAPS J; 2007 Jun; 9(2):E260-7. PubMed ID: 17907767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of Monte Carlo simulations in the assessment of calibration strategies--Part II: design of a software package (CalEval).
    Burrows J
    Bioanalysis; 2013 Apr; 5(8):945-58. PubMed ID: 23590477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Percent residual accuracy for quantifying goodness-of-fit of linear calibration curves.
    Logue BA; Manandhar E
    Talanta; 2018 Nov; 189():527-533. PubMed ID: 30086955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.