These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9548149)
1. Profiling assisted reproductive technology: the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry and the rising costs of assisted reproductive technology. Garcia JE Fertil Steril; 1998 Apr; 69(4):624-6. PubMed ID: 9548149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1995 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril; 1998 Mar; 69(3):389-98. PubMed ID: 9531864 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1993 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril; 1995 Jul; 64(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 7789548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1994 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril; 1996 Nov; 66(5):697-705. PubMed ID: 8893670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1996 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril; 1999 May; 71(5):798-807. PubMed ID: 10231036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1992 results generated from the American Fertility Society/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril; 1994 Dec; 62(6):1121-8. PubMed ID: 7957974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1997 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Fertil Steril; 2000 Oct; 74(4):641-53; discussion 653-4. PubMed ID: 11020500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry. ; Fertil Steril; 2007 Jun; 87(6):1253-66. PubMed ID: 17276436 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and assisted reproductive technology in the United States: a 2016 update. Toner JP; Coddington CC; Doody K; Van Voorhis B; Seifer DB; Ball GD; Luke B; Wantman E Fertil Steril; 2016 Sep; 106(3):541-6. PubMed ID: 27301796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States and Canada: 1991 results from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology generated from the American Fertility Society Registry. Fertil Steril; 1993 May; 59(5):956-62. PubMed ID: 8486195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1998 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology and the American Society for Reproductive Medicine Fertil Steril; 2002 Jan; 77(1):18-31. PubMed ID: 11779586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 1999 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. ; Fertil Steril; 2002 Nov; 78(5):918-31. PubMed ID: 12413974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred. Dickey RP Fertil Steril; 2007 Dec; 88(6):1554-61. PubMed ID: 17481621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surveillance of assisted reproductive technology in the United States. An update. Meikle SF; Danel I; Wilcox LS Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 10407592 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Assisted reproductive technologies reported in the National Registry of Israel 1995-1996]. Insler V; Gonnen O; Levran D; Lotan Y; Fish B; Potashnik G; Kogosovsky A; Ron-El R; Harefuah; 2000 Dec; 139(11-12):421-4, 495. PubMed ID: 11341185 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1997. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. European IVF-Monitoring Programme (EIM), for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Nygren KG; Andersen AN Hum Reprod; 2001 Feb; 16(2):384-91. PubMed ID: 11157839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproductive technology--the price of progress. Collins JA N Engl J Med; 1994 Jul; 331(4):270-1. PubMed ID: 8015577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The history of assisted reproductive technology and its future. Frishman G; Blazar A Med Health R I; 1997 Dec; 80(12):393-6. PubMed ID: 9433067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]