These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9548149)
21. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in vitro fertilization registry 2.0. Meldrum D Fertil Steril; 2013 Nov; 100(5):1212-3. PubMed ID: 24112526 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Discrepancies in SART (Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology) reporting. Feinman MA Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 May; 172(5):1637-8. PubMed ID: 7755084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2000 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Registry. ; Fertil Steril; 2004 May; 81(5):1207-20. PubMed ID: 15136079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Assessing the costs of assisted reproductive techniques. Souter V; Penney G Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1996 Oct; 103(10):1049; author reply 1049-50. PubMed ID: 8863711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Collection and report of assisted reproductive technology outcome data: problems and solutions. Martin MC Fertil Steril; 1993 Nov; 60(5):762-3. PubMed ID: 8224257 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Incidence and costs of multifetal pregnancies in Andalusia (2000-2010). Mesa EG; Peral JA Twin Res Hum Genet; 2011 Oct; 14(5):484-9. PubMed ID: 21962143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assisted reproductive technologies: estimates of their contribution to multiple births and newborn hospital days in the United States. Wilcox LS; Kiely JL; Melvin CL; Martin MC Fertil Steril; 1996 Feb; 65(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 8566263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. On reporting pregnancies by assisted reproductive technology. Jones HW; Veeck LL; Muasher SJ; Gibbons WE Fertil Steril; 1993 Nov; 60(5):759-61. PubMed ID: 8224256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 1998. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Nygren KG; Andersen AN; Hum Reprod; 2001 Nov; 16(11):2459-71. PubMed ID: 11679538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproductive technologies and the bottom line. Powledge T Women Health; 1987; 13(1-2):203-9. PubMed ID: 3332829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Health policy dilemmas related to high technology infertility services. Miller AM Image J Nurs Sch; 1993; 25(1):79. PubMed ID: 8449536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A plea for a more fastidious and objective use of statistics. Walters DE J Assist Reprod Genet; 1994 Feb; 11(2):63-73. PubMed ID: 7819705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Pregnancy outcomes decline in recipients over age 44: an analysis of 27,959 fresh donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Yeh JS; Steward RG; Dude AM; Shah AA; Goldfarb JM; Muasher SJ Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1331-6. PubMed ID: 24626061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Infertility and assisted reproductive technology: the role of the perinatal social worker. Greenfeld DA Soc Work Health Care; 1997; 24(3-4):39-46. PubMed ID: 9127903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies world report: Assisted Reproductive Technology 2006. Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson GD; Dyer S; de Mouzon J; Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F Hum Reprod; 2014 Jul; 29(7):1536-51. PubMed ID: 24795090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]