239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9548238)
1. Neuroscientist accused of misconduct turns on his accusers.
Dalton R
Nature; 1998 Apr; 392(6675):424. PubMed ID: 9548238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. 'Misconduct' dispute raises fears of litigation.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Jan; 385(6612):105. PubMed ID: 8990102
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Federal panel endorses Baylor fraud claim.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Feb; 397(6720):549. PubMed ID: 10050835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Policing fraud and deceit: the legal aspects of misconduct in scientific inquiry.
Protti M
J Infor Ethics; 1996; 5(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 11653390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Tougher crackdown on fraud needed.
del Guercio P
Nature; 1998 Aug; 394(6696):823. PubMed ID: 9732860
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. More gold and more fleece: improving the legal sanctions against medical research fraud.
O'Reilly JT
Adm Law Rev; 1990; 42(3):393-422. PubMed ID: 15991411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Baylor backed over 'falsified data' claims.
Dalton R
Nature; 1997 Apr; 386(6627):747. PubMed ID: 9126718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The demise of the social contract for science: misconduct in science and the nonmodern world.
Guston DH
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):215-48. PubMed ID: 11656758
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Scientific misconduct in academia: a survey and analysis of applicable law.
Sise CB
San Diego Law Rev; 1991; 28(2):401-28. PubMed ID: 11651628
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Definitions and boundaries of research misconduct: perspectives from a federal government viewpoint.
Price AR
J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):286-97. PubMed ID: 11653365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. NIH office plans research on misconduct.
Dalton R
Nature; 1999 Jul; 400(6740):99. PubMed ID: 10408427
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Teaching scientific integrity.
Gifford F
Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):297-314. PubMed ID: 11656760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fraud squad moves in on universities.
Cross M; Connor S; Anderson I
New Sci; 1985 Jun; 106(1459):8. PubMed ID: 11655696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Salem comes to the National Institutes of Health: notes from inside the crucible of scientific integrity.
Needleman HL
Pediatrics; 1992 Dec; 90(6):977-81. PubMed ID: 1331947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Regulating academic-industrial research relationships--solving problems or stifling progress?
Stossel TP
N Engl J Med; 2005 Sep; 353(10):1060-5. PubMed ID: 16148294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. "Thank God for the lawyers": some thoughts on the (mis)regulation of scientific misconduct.
Reynolds GH
Tenn Law Rev; 1999; 66(3):801-18. PubMed ID: 12625356
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. US panel rejects hiding source of allegations of misconduct.
Anderson C
Nature; 1992 Oct; 359(6398):765. PubMed ID: 1436045
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fraud and misrepresentation in research--whose responsibility?
Wigodsky HS
IRB; 1984; 6(2):1-5. PubMed ID: 11649536
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. NIH misconduct probes draw legal complaints.
Culliton BJ
Science; 1990 Jul; 249(4966):240-2. PubMed ID: 2374923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. What to do about scientific misconduct.
Nature; 1994 May; 369(6478):261-2. PubMed ID: 8183349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
