These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9548238)
21. Scientific misconduct. A final frenzy for landmark cases? Anderson C Nature; 1992 Jan; 355(6355):6-7. PubMed ID: 1731200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Regulation of scientific misconduct in federally funded research. Steinberg NA South Calif Interdiscip Law J; 2000; 10(1):39-105. PubMed ID: 12953675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Responsibilities of awardee and applicant institutions for dealing with and reporting possible misconduct in science; final rule. US Public Health Service Fed Regist; 1989 Aug; 54(151):32446-51. PubMed ID: 11651184 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The federal research misconduct regulations as viewed from the research universities. Wright DE Centen Rev; 1994; 38(2):249-72. PubMed ID: 11656759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Scientific misconduct. Investigations on trial in a Texas court. Marshall E Science; 1999 Feb; 283(5404):913-4. PubMed ID: 10075554 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. US Government inquiry bodies dismiss scientific misconduct charges against AIDS researchers. Marwick C JAMA; 1993 Dec; 270(22):2665-6. PubMed ID: 8133572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Misconduct and social control in science: issues, problems, solutions. Fox MF; Braxton JM J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):373-83. PubMed ID: 11653368 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Ruling brings cash windfall in US fraud case. Dalton R Nature; 1995 May; 375(6529):270. PubMed ID: 7753183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158. United States US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Scientific misconduct. Baylor saga comes to an end. Kaiser J Science; 1999 Feb; 283(5405):1091. PubMed ID: 10075561 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. National Institutes of Health stop Harvard researchers' grants. Shulman S Nature; 1988 Dec; 336(6199):506. PubMed ID: 3200294 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Criminal liability for misconduct in scientific research. Kuzma SM Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1992; 25(2):357-421. PubMed ID: 11651584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The politics of research misconduct: congressional oversight, universities, and science. LaFollette MC J Higher Educ; 1994; 65(3):261-85. PubMed ID: 11653364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. NIH guidance is rejected. McGourty C Nature; 1989 Jul; 340(6228):7. PubMed ID: 2739726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Science, integrity, and investigators' rights: current challenges. Daniell WE Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1996 Aug; 24(1 Pt 2):S152-62. PubMed ID: 8921570 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Giving scientists their due. The Imanishi-Kari decision. Dresser R Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):26-8. PubMed ID: 9219021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Rights to due process in instances of possible scientific misconduct. Hallum JV; Hadley SW Endocrinology; 1991 Feb; 128(2):643-4. PubMed ID: 1989853 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]