These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9548238)

  • 41. Extracting the teeth from the False Claims Act.
    Walter C; Richards EP
    IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag; 1997; 16(3):93-5. PubMed ID: 9158993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. NIH misconduct procedures derailed.
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Jan; 251(4990):152-3. PubMed ID: 1846242
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. A costly settlement ends whistle-blower suit.
    Taubes G
    Science; 1994 Feb; 263(5147):605. PubMed ID: 8303265
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Misconduct in science.
    Budetti PP
    Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):99. PubMed ID: 2323502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Harvard faces questions on missing data.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 1997 Mar; 386(6622):206. PubMed ID: 9069272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office--perhaps a new leaf.
    Rennie D; Gunsalus CK
    JAMA; 1993 Feb; 269(7):915-7. PubMed ID: 8426452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. NIH grapples with misconduct.
    Broad WJ
    Science; 1982 Jul; 217(4556):227. PubMed ID: 7089558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. ORI finds Imanishi-Kari guilty of misconduct, proposes 10-year ban.
    Gavaghan H
    Nature; 1994 Dec; 372(6505):391. PubMed ID: 7984221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A judgement fit for prime time.
    Nature; 1996 Jun; 381(6585):717. PubMed ID: 8657262
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Imanishi-Kari still in limbo.
    Nature; 1994 Mar; 368(6466):1-2. PubMed ID: 8107875
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The case of the altered notebooks: Part IV.
    Culliton BJ
    Science; 1990 May; 248(4957):809. PubMed ID: 2188358
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Fraud in scientific research: the prosecutor's approach.
    Willcox BL
    Account Res; 1992; 2(2):139-51. PubMed ID: 16144093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Recent government decision refocuses attention on several cases of alleged scientific misconduct.
    Marwick C
    JAMA; 1993 Sep; 270(11):1286. PubMed ID: 8395607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Science needs vigilance not vigilantes.
    Woolf PK
    JAMA; 1988 Oct; 260(13):1939-40. PubMed ID: 3418857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Scientific workforce. Suit seeks redress for a start-up package gone sour.
    Mervis J
    Science; 2011 Jul; 333(6038):24-5. PubMed ID: 21719653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Verdict in sight in the "Baltimore case".
    Hamilton DP
    Science; 1991 Mar; 251(4998):1168-72. PubMed ID: 1900949
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Sanctions for research misconduct: a legal perspective.
    Dresser R
    Acad Med; 1993 Sep; 68(9 Suppl):S39-43. PubMed ID: 8396938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Scientists 'too quick' to back claims.
    Nadis S
    Nature; 1996 Nov; 384(6604):6. PubMed ID: 8900257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Reassignment for NIH's fraud hunters.
    Greenberg DS
    Lancet; 1993 May; 341(8854):1204-5. PubMed ID: 8098089
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Due process protection.
    Hallum JV; Hadley SW
    Nature; 1990 Sep; 347(6289):116. PubMed ID: 2395466
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.