341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9549791)
1. Metallic artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging of patients with spinal fusion. A comparison of implant materials and imaging sequences.
Rudisch A; Kremser C; Peer S; Kathrein A; Judmaier W; Daniaux H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(6):692-9. PubMed ID: 9549791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of MR issues for the latest standard brands of orthopedic metal implants: plates and screws.
Zou YF; Chu B; Wang CB; Hu ZY
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 84(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 25544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of magnetic resonance and computed tomographic image quality after the implantation of tantalum and titanium spinal instrumentation.
Wang JC; Yu WD; Sandhu HS; Tam V; Delamarter RB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Aug; 23(15):1684-8. PubMed ID: 9704376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimizing artifacts caused by metallic implants at MR imaging: experimental and clinical studies.
Suh JS; Jeong EK; Shin KH; Cho JH; Na JB; Kim DH; Han CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Nov; 171(5):1207-13. PubMed ID: 9798849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The radiographic and imaging characteristics of porous tantalum implants within the human cervical spine.
Levi AD; Choi WG; Keller PJ; Heiserman JE; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Jun; 23(11):1245-50; discussion 1251. PubMed ID: 9636978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging in cadaver dogs with metallic vertebral implants at 3 Tesla: evaluation of the WARP-turbo spin echo sequence.
Griffin JF; Archambault NS; Mankin JM; Wall CR; Thompson JA; Padua A; Purdy D; Kerwin SC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(24):E1548-53. PubMed ID: 23921320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metallic spinal artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging.
Vaccaro AR; Chesnut RM; Scuderi G; Healy JF; Massie JB; Garfin SR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Jun; 19(11):1237-42. PubMed ID: 8073315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Postimplantation MRI with cylindric and cubic intervertebral test implants: evaluation of implant shape, material, and volume in MRI artifacting--an in vitro study.
Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Buchhorn G
Spine J; 2007; 7(3):353-9. PubMed ID: 17482121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging with titanium implants of the thoracic and lumbar spine.
Ortiz O; Pait TG; McAllister P; Sauter K
Neurosurgery; 1996 Apr; 38(4):741-5. PubMed ID: 8692394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Liver T2-weighted MR imaging: comparison of fast and conventional half-Fourier single-shot turbo spin-echo, breath-hold turbo spin-echo, and respiratory-triggered turbo spin-echo sequences.
Tang Y; Yamashita Y; Namimoto T; Abe Y; Takahashi M
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):766-72. PubMed ID: 9169702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reducing metallic artifacts in postoperative spinal imaging: usefulness of IDEAL contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging--phantom and clinical studies.
Cha JG; Jin W; Lee MH; Kim DH; Park JS; Shin WH; Yi BH
Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):885-93. PubMed ID: 21386053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The interobserver-validated relevance of intervertebral spacer materials in MRI artifacting.
Ernstberger T; Heidrich G; Bruening T; Krefft S; Buchhorn G; Klinger HM
Eur Spine J; 2007 Feb; 16(2):179-85. PubMed ID: 16463200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of HASTE and segmented-HASTE sequences with a T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence in the screening evaluation of the brain.
Sugahara T; Korogi Y; Hirai T; Hamatake S; Ikushima I; Shigematu Y; Takahashi M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1401-10. PubMed ID: 9353469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Postfusion magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by a titanium, cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, and carbon intervertebral disc spacer.
Ernstberger T; Heidrich G
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Apr; 20(2):154-9. PubMed ID: 17414986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Magnetic resonance imaging metallic artifact of commonly encountered surgical implants and foreign material.
Sutherland-Smith J; Tilley B
Vet Radiol Ultrasound; 2012; 53(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 22277053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Internally stabilized spine: optimal choice of frequency-encoding gradient direction during MR imaging minimizes susceptibility artifact from titanium vertebral body screws.
Frazzini VI; Kagetsu NJ; Johnson CE; Destian S
Radiology; 1997 Jul; 204(1):268-72. PubMed ID: 9205258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calculation of T2 relaxation time from ultrafast single shot sequences for differentiation of liver tumors: comparison of echo-planar, HASTE, and spin-echo sequences.
Abe Y; Yamashita Y; Tang Y; Namimoto T; Takahashi M
Radiat Med; 2000; 18(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 10852650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of fat-saturated T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging with slice encoding for metal artifact correction (SEMAC) at 3T.
Lee YH; Lim D; Kim E; Kim S; Song HT; Suh JS
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 32(8):1001-5. PubMed ID: 24925839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. SEMAC-VAT and MSVAT-SPACE sequence strategies for metal artifact reduction in 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging.
Ai T; Padua A; Goerner F; Nittka M; Gugala Z; Jadhav S; Trelles M; Johnson RF; Lindsey RW; Li X; Runge VM
Invest Radiol; 2012 May; 47(5):267-76. PubMed ID: 22266987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of metal artifact reduction techniques in magnetic resonance imaging of carbon-reinforced PEEK and titanium spinal implants.
Osterhoff G; Huber FA; Graf LC; Erdlen F; Pape HC; Sprengel K; Guggenberger R
Acta Radiol; 2022 Aug; 63(8):1062-1070. PubMed ID: 34229463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
