These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9549799)

  • 1. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion: a comparison study.
    Hughes S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Mar; 23(6):744. PubMed ID: 9549799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion: a comparison study.
    Garth GC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Apr; 23(8):961-2. PubMed ID: 9580968
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of five cervical orthoses in restricting cervical motion. A comparison study.
    Askins V; Eismont FJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Jun; 22(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 9201855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effectiveness of Adjustable Cervical Orthoses and Modular Cervical Thoracic Orthoses in Restricting Neck Motion: A Comparative In vivo Biomechanical Study.
    Gao F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(19):E1046-51. PubMed ID: 26076435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cervical orthoses effect on cervical spine motion: roentgenographic and goniometric method of study.
    Fisher SV; Bowar JF; Awad EA; Gullickson G
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1977 Mar; 58(3):109-15. PubMed ID: 843201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical spine motion in normal women: radiographic study of effect of cervical collars.
    Colachis SC; Strohm BR; Ganter EL
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1973 Apr; 54(4):161-9. PubMed ID: 4697222
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reduction in head and intervertebral motion provided by 7 contemporary cervical orthoses in 45 individuals.
    Schneider AM; Hipp JA; Nguyen L; Reitman CA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jan; 32(1):E1-6. PubMed ID: 17202874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of rigid cervical collar height on full, active, and functional range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Dec; 35(26):E1546-52. PubMed ID: 21116218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mastication causing segmental spinal motion in common cervical orthoses.
    Chin KR; Auerbach JD; Adams SB; Sodl JF; Riew KD
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):430-4. PubMed ID: 16481953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effectiveness of various cervical orthoses. An in vivo comparison of the mechanical stability provided by several widely used models.
    Sandler AJ; Dvorak J; Humke T; Grob D; Daniels W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1996 Jul; 21(14):1624-9. PubMed ID: 8839463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing range of motion to evaluate the adverse effects of ill-fitting cervical orthoses.
    Bell KM; Frazier EC; Shively CM; Hartman RA; Ulibarri JC; Lee JY; Kang JD; Donaldson WF
    Spine J; 2009 Mar; 9(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 18504164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Soft and rigid collars provide similar restriction in cervical range of motion during fifteen activities of daily living.
    Miller CP; Bible JE; Jegede KA; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Jun; 35(13):1271-8. PubMed ID: 20512025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Use of cervical collar after single-level anterior cervical fusion with plate: is it necessary?
    Campbell MJ; Carreon LY; Traynelis V; Anderson PA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 19077924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of efficacy and 3D kinematic characteristics of cervical orthoses.
    Zhang S; Wortley M; Clowers K; Krusenklaus JH
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2005 Mar; 20(3):264-9. PubMed ID: 15698698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cervical orthoses: a guide to their selection and use.
    Johnson RM; Owen JR; Hart DL; Callahan RA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1981; (154):34-45. PubMed ID: 7471583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cervical sagittal range-of-motion analysis using three methods. Cervical range-of-motion device, 3space, and radiography.
    Ordway NR; Seymour R; Donelson RG; Hojnowski L; Lee E; Edwards WT
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1997 Mar; 22(5):501-8. PubMed ID: 9076881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cervical spine movements during laryngoscopy. Comparison of the Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscope blades.
    MacIntyre PA; McLeod AD; Hurley R; Peacock C
    Anaesthesia; 1999 May; 54(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 10995135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Agreement of measures obtained radiographically and by the OSI CA-6000 Spine Motion Analyzer for cervical spinal motion.
    Petersen CM; Schuit D; Johnson RD; Knecht H; Levine P
    Man Ther; 2008 Jun; 13(3):200-5. PubMed ID: 17379566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cervical orthoses.
    Beavis A
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Apr; 13(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 2717386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.