These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9550017)

  • 1. Marginal sealability of resin-modified glass ionomers for base/liner: effect of hygroscopic expansion and bond strength.
    Irie M; Nakai H
    Dent Mater J; 1996 Dec; 15(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 9550017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Marginal seal of resin-modified glass ionomers and compomers: effect of delaying polishing procedure after one-day storage.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):488-96. PubMed ID: 11203861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Water storage effect on the marginal seal of resin-modified glass-ionomer restorations.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(5):272-8. PubMed ID: 10823073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal gap formation of light-activated restorative materials: effects of immediate setting shrinkage and bond strength.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2002 May; 18(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 11823011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marginal gap formation of light-activated base/liner materials: effect of setting shrinkage and bond strength.
    Irie M; Suzuki K
    Dent Mater; 1999 Nov; 15(6):403-7. PubMed ID: 10863439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physical properties of dual-cured luting-agents correlated to early no interfacial-gap incidence with composite inlay restorations.
    Irie M; Maruo Y; Nishigawa G; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jun; 26(6):608-15. PubMed ID: 20334906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal adaptation of resin-bonded light-cured glass ionomers in dentin cavities.
    Fritz UB; Finger WJ; Uno S
    Am J Dent; 1996 Dec; 9(6):253-8. PubMed ID: 9545879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of conventional and resin-modified glass-ionomer liner on dentin adhesive interface of Class I cavity walls after thermocycling.
    Sampaio PC; de Almeida Júnior AA; Francisconi LF; Casas-Apayco LC; Pereira JC; Wang L; Atta MT
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(4):403-12. PubMed ID: 21913841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of adhesive restorative materials.
    Gladys S; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P; Vanherle G
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 11572296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marginal and flexural integrity of three classes of luting cement, with early finishing and water storage.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jan; 20(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 14698768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Posterior resin composite restorations with or without resin-modified, glass-ionomer cement lining: a 1-year randomized, clinical trial.
    Banomyong D; Harnirattisai C; Burrow MF
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 25427330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of dentin conditioning on bond strength of light-cured ionomer restorative materials and polyacid-modified composite resins.
    Buchalla W; Attin T; Hellwig E
    J Clin Dent; 1996; 7(4):81-4. PubMed ID: 9238882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations.
    Friedl KH; Schmalz G; Hiller KA; Mortazavi F
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 9227124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Bond strengths of fluoride-releasing restorative materials.
    Fruits TJ; Duncanson MG; Miller RC
    Am J Dent; 1996 Oct; 9(5):219-22. PubMed ID: 9545909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Immediate performance of self-etching versus system adhesives with multiple light-activated restoratives.
    Irie M; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2004 Nov; 20(9):873-80. PubMed ID: 15451243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 21740244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.