These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9550017)

  • 41. Physical properties of resin-modified glass-ionomers.
    Kim Y; Hirano S; Hirasawa T
    Dent Mater J; 1998 Mar; 17(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 9663064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin.
    Shirai K; De Munck J; Yoshida Y; Inoue S; Lambrechts P; Suzuki K; Shintani H; Van Meerbeek B
    Dent Mater; 2005 Feb; 21(2):110-24. PubMed ID: 15681009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations.
    Dietrich T; Kraemer M; Lösche GM; Wernecke KD; Roulet JF
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):401-10. PubMed ID: 11203848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of a filled adhesive on bond strength in three dentinal bonding systems.
    Fanning DE; Wakefield CW; Robbins JW; Bagley AL
    Gen Dent; 1995; 43(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 8940582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. In vitro characterization of visible light-cured glass ionomer liners.
    Eliades G; Palaghias G
    Dent Mater; 1993 May; 9(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 8056176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. A comparison of the shear bond strengths to a resin composite of two conventional and two resin-modified glass polyalkenoate (ionomer) cements.
    Chadwick RG; Woolford MJ
    J Dent; 1993 Apr; 21(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 8473591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Bond strength of a light-cured and two auto-cured glass ionomer liners.
    Holtan JR; Nystrom GP; Olin PS; Rudney J; Douglas WH
    J Dent; 1990 Oct; 18(5):271-5. PubMed ID: 2150073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. In vitro shear bond strength of three self-adhesive resin cements and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement to various prosthodontic substrates.
    Sabatini C; Patel M; D'Silva E
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):186-96. PubMed ID: 22913244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Dentin bonding of cements. The bonding of cements with dentin in combination with various indirect restorative materials].
    Peutzfeldt A; Sahafi A; Flury S
    Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2011; 121(12):1153-63. PubMed ID: 22203577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth.
    Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cements to caries-affected dentin.
    Palma-Dibb RG; de Castro CG; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Chinelatti MA
    J Adhes Dent; 2003; 5(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 12729084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Adaptation to the cavity floor of the light-cured glass ionomer cement base under a composite restoration.
    Hotta M; Aono M
    J Oral Rehabil; 1994 Nov; 21(6):679-85. PubMed ID: 7830203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Long-term effect of dentin primers on enamel bond strength and marginal adaptation.
    Frankenberger R; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11203784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Microleakage in class II composite resin restorations: total bonding and open sandwich technique.
    Loguercio AD; Alessandra R; Mazzocco KC; Dias AL; Busato AL; Singer Jda M; Rosa P
    J Adhes Dent; 2002; 4(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 12236642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Effect of light-curing method and irradiation time on marginal sealing and cavity wall adaptation of resin composite restorations.
    Yoshikawa T; Nakaoki Y; Takada T; Burrow MF; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 2003 Sep; 16 Spec No():63A-67A. PubMed ID: 14674502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.