These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9550018)

  • 1. Adherence of oral streptococci to composite resin of varying surface roughness.
    Yamamoto K; Ohashi S; Taki E; Hirata K
    Dent Mater J; 1996 Dec; 15(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 9550018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Streptococcal adhesion to novel low-shrink silorane-based restorative.
    Buergers R; Schneider-Brachert W; Hahnel S; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 18768217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The influence of oral bacteria on the surfaces of resin-based dental restorative materials--an in vitro study.
    Willershausen B; Callaway A; Ernst CP; Stender E
    Int Dent J; 1999 Aug; 49(4):231-9. PubMed ID: 10858759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adherence of oral streptococci to composite resin restorative materials.
    Yamamoto K; Noda H; Kimura K
    J Dent; 1989 Oct; 17(5):225-9. PubMed ID: 2621272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbial changes in biofilms on composite resins with different surface roughness: An in vitro study with a multispecies biofilm model.
    Park JW; An JS; Lim WH; Lim BS; Ahn SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Nov; 122(5):493.e1-493.e8. PubMed ID: 31648793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bacterial colonization of resin composite cements: influence of material composition and surface roughness.
    Glauser S; Astasov-Frauenhoffer M; Müller JA; Fischer J; Waltimo T; Rohr N
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2017 Aug; 125(4):294-302. PubMed ID: 28618020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite resins.
    Mei L; Busscher HJ; van der Mei HC; Ren Y
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):770-8. PubMed ID: 21524789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adhesion in vitro of oral streptococci to porcelain, composite resin cement and human enamel.
    Takatsuka T; Konishi N; Nakabo S; Hashimoto T; Torii Y; Yoshiyama M
    Dent Mater J; 2000 Dec; 19(4):363-72. PubMed ID: 11816366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biofilm-induced changes to the composite surface.
    Nedeljkovic I; De Munck J; Ungureanu AA; Slomka V; Bartic C; Vananroye A; Clasen C; Teughels W; Van Meerbeek B; Van Landuyt KL
    J Dent; 2017 Aug; 63():36-43. PubMed ID: 28554609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term antibacterial surface properties of composite resin incorporating polyethyleneimine nanoparticles.
    Beyth N; Yudovin-Fearber I; Domb AJ; Weiss EI
    Quintessence Int; 2010; 41(10):827-35. PubMed ID: 20927419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of surface roughness of composite resin on biofilm formation of Streptococcus mutans in the presence of saliva.
    Park JW; Song CW; Jung JH; Ahn SJ; Ferracane JL
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(5):532-9. PubMed ID: 22339385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In vitro colonisation of acrylic resin denture base materials by Streptococcus oralis and Actinomyces viscosus.
    Kagermeier-Callaway AS; Willershausen B; Frank T; Stender E
    Int Dent J; 2000 Apr; 50(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 10945186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bacterial adhesion of Streptococcus mutans to provisional fixed prosthodontic material.
    Buergers R; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Dec; 98(6):461-9. PubMed ID: 18061740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An in vitro evaluation of wear and surface roughness of particulate filler composite resin after tooth brushing.
    Al Khuraif AA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2014 Nov; 72(8):977-83. PubMed ID: 25220522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid resin composites after polishing and brushing.
    Senawongse P; Pongprueksa P
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2007; 19(5):265-73; discussion 274-5. PubMed ID: 17877626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conventional polishing techniques versus a nanofilled surface sealer: preliminary findings regarding surface roughness changes and analysis.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW
    J Clin Dent; 2010; 21(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 20527508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The anti-adherence activity and bactericidal effect of microparticulate silver additives in composite resin materials.
    Bürgers R; Eidt A; Frankenberger R; Rosentritt M; Schweikl H; Handel G; Hahnel S
    Arch Oral Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(6):595-601. PubMed ID: 19375069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion.
    Aykent F; Yondem I; Ozyesil AG; Gunal SK; Avunduk MC; Ozkan S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):221-7. PubMed ID: 20362765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of two prophylaxis methods on adherence of Streptococcus mutans to microfilled composite resin and giomer surfaces.
    Kimyai S; Lotfipour F; Pourabbas R; Sadr A; Nikazar S; Milani M
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 Jul; 16(4):e561-7. PubMed ID: 20711117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of composite resin filler particles by using scanning electron microscopy and digital imaging.
    Jaarda MJ; Lang BR; Wang RF; Edwards CA
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Apr; 69(4):416-24. PubMed ID: 8463973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.