These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9550032)

  • 21. Comparison of air-driven vs electric torque control motors on canal centering ability by ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Zarei M; Javidi M; Erfanian M; Lomee M; Afkhami F
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 Jan; 14(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 23579897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of hand and rotary instrumentation for removing gutta-percha from previously treated curved root canals: a microcomputed tomography study.
    Rödig T; Kupis J; Konietschke F; Dullin C; Drebenstedt S; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2014 Feb; 47(2):173-82. PubMed ID: 23701239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of Different Glide Path Files on Apical Debris Extrusion in Curved Root Canals.
    Gunes B; Yesildal Yeter K
    J Endod; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1191-1194. PubMed ID: 29884338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A comparison of spreader penetration depth and load required during lateral condensation in teeth prepared using various root canal preparation techniques.
    Dulaimi SF; Wali Al-Hashimi MK
    Int Endod J; 2005 Aug; 38(8):510-5. PubMed ID: 16011768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Influence of cervical preflaring on apical file size determination.
    Pecora JD; Capelli A; Guerisoli DM; Spanó JC; Estrela C
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jul; 38(7):430-5. PubMed ID: 15946262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the relative efficacies of four hand and rotary instrumentation techniques during endodontic retreatment.
    Imura N; Kato AS; Hata GI; Uemura M; Toda T; Weine F
    Int Endod J; 2000 Jul; 33(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 11307212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy of ProTaper NEXT Compared with Reciproc in Removing Obturation Material from Severely Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
    Nevares G; de Albuquerque DS; Freire LG; Romeiro K; Fogel HM; Dos Santos M; Cunha RS
    J Endod; 2016 May; 42(5):803-8. PubMed ID: 27117757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Residual dentin thickness in mandibular premolars prepared with hand and rotatory instruments.
    Pilo R; Corcino G; Tamse A
    J Endod; 1998 Jun; 24(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 9693582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of modified Hedstrom files on instrumentation area produced by ProFile instruments in oval canals.
    Iqbal MK; Karabucak B; Brown M; Menegazzo E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Oct; 98(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 15472667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Preparation of the apical part of the root canal by the Lightspeed and step-back techniques.
    Portenier I; Lutz F; Barbakow F
    Int Endod J; 1998 Mar; 31(2):103-11. PubMed ID: 9868936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The efficacy of five techniques for removing root filling material: microscopic versus radiographic evaluation.
    Kfir A; Tsesis I; Yakirevich E; Matalon S; Abramovitz I
    Int Endod J; 2012 Jan; 45(1):35-41. PubMed ID: 21899565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of effects of ProTaper, HeroShaper, and Gates Glidden Burs on cervical dentin thickness and root canal volume by using multislice computed tomography.
    Mahran AH; AboEl-Fotouh MM
    J Endod; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 18793924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals.
    Weiger R; ElAyouti A; Löst C
    J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):580-3. PubMed ID: 12184418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A micro-computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques.
    Moore J; Fitz-Walter P; Parashos P
    Int Endod J; 2009 Dec; 42(12):1057-64. PubMed ID: 19912375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of root thickness in curved canals after flaring.
    Isom TL; Marshall JG; Baumgartner JC
    J Endod; 1995 Jul; 21(7):368-71. PubMed ID: 7499977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison between a smooth wire and a K-file in removing artificially placed dentine debris from root canals in resin blocks during ultrasonic irrigation.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Sep; 38(9):593-6. PubMed ID: 16104971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The efficacy of ultrasonic irrigation to remove artificially placed dentine debris from human root canals prepared using instruments of varying taper.
    van der Sluis LW; Wu MK; Wesselink PR
    Int Endod J; 2005 Oct; 38(10):764-8. PubMed ID: 16164691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Efficacy of CM-Wire, M-Wire, and Nickel-Titanium Instruments for Removing Filling Material from Curved Root Canals: A Micro-Computed Tomography Study.
    Rodrigues CT; Duarte MA; de Almeida MM; de Andrade FB; Bernardineli N
    J Endod; 2016 Nov; 42(11):1651-1655. PubMed ID: 27651042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of Root Canal Preparation Techniques on Crack Formation in Root Dentin.
    Shantiaee Y; Dianat O; Mosayebi G; Namdari M; Tordik P
    J Endod; 2019 Apr; 45(4):447-452. PubMed ID: 30827767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Hard-tissue debris accumulation created by conventional rotary versus self-adjusting file instrumentation in mesial root canal systems of mandibular molars.
    Paqué F; Al-Jadaa A; Kfir A
    Int Endod J; 2012 May; 45(5):413-8. PubMed ID: 22188277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.