151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9550234)
1. Managed care's responsibility for decisions to deny benefits: the ERISA obstacle. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Appelbaum PS
Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Apr; 49(4):461-2, 472. PubMed ID: 9550234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. ERISA update. Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Sfikas PM
J Am Dent Assoc; 1998 Dec; 129(12):1754-5. PubMed ID: 9854928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Legal liability and managed care.
Schouten R
Harv Rev Psychiatry; 1993; 1(3):189-90. PubMed ID: 9384846
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2004 Sep; 351(13):1347-52. PubMed ID: 15385665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Managed care, liability, and ERISA.
Stone AA
Psychiatr Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 22(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 10083942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Managed care: Texas's Health Care Liability Act held partially preempted by ERISA.
Hauswirth M
J Law Med Ethics; 1998; 26(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 11066883
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. What recourse? Liability for managed-care decisions and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
Mariner WK
N Engl J Med; 2000 Aug; 343(8):592-6. PubMed ID: 10954770
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The states, Congress, or the courts: who will be first to reform ERISA remedies?
Rooney CD
Ann Health Law; 1998; 7():73-106. PubMed ID: 10187382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ERISA and medical professional liability.
Griffen FD; Adelman SH
Bull Am Coll Surg; 1998 Jul; 83(7):16-21. PubMed ID: 10345205
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Physician liability and managed care: a philosophical perspective.
Fine DK
Ga State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 19(3):641-703. PubMed ID: 15214340
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Liability for managed care decisions: the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the uneven playing field.
Mariner WK
Am J Public Health; 1996 Jun; 86(6):863-9. PubMed ID: 8659664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Supreme Court may be managed care's new best friend.
Plunkett LR
N Y State Dent J; 2000 Nov; 66(9):6-8. PubMed ID: 11143725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Case law update. State law negligence actions against MCOs are pre-empted by ERISA.
West JC
J Healthc Risk Manag; 2004; 24(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 20196010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. District court rules on Texas Health Care Liability Act.
Hansen E
Manag Care Interface; 1998 Nov; 11(11):87-8. PubMed ID: 10187421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Do we still need a federal patients' bill of rights?
Law SA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2002; 3(1):1-34. PubMed ID: 12825425
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Finance issue brief: insurer liability: year end report-2003.
MacEachern L
Issue Brief Health Policy Track Serv; 2003 Dec; ():1-19. PubMed ID: 14964230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ERISA preemption and its impact on behavioral health services.
Simmons P
Behav Healthc Tomorrow; 1997 Jun; 6(3):67-9. PubMed ID: 10169463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ERISA and managed care: the law abhors a vacuum.
Farrell MG
J Health Hosp Law; 1996 Dec; 29(5):268-87. PubMed ID: 10164235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The swinging pendulum: the Supreme Court reverses course on ERISA and managed care.
Kesselheim AS; Brennan TA
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics; 2005; 5(1):451-63. PubMed ID: 15742588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical responsibility and legal liability in managed care.
Moskowitz EH
J Am Geriatr Soc; 1998 Mar; 46(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 9514390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
