These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9552821)

  • 1. Effectiveness of diamond-impregnated felt wheels for polishing a hybrid composite.
    Jung M; Baumstieger M; Klimek J
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9552821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after polishing.
    Jung M; Bruegger H; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 14653299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A randomised controlled study on the use of finishing and polishing systems on different resin composites using 3D contact optical profilometry and scanning electron microscopy.
    Daud A; Gray G; Lynch CD; Wilson NHF; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2018 Apr; 71():25-30. PubMed ID: 29360492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite enamel and composite dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part I: roughness after treatments with tungsten carbide vs diamond burs.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(1):70-89. PubMed ID: 24757700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of packable composites.
    Roeder LB; Tate WH; Powers JM
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):534-43. PubMed ID: 11203867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Surface roughness of glass-ceramic insert-composite restorations: assessing several polishing techniques.
    Ashe MJ; Tripp GA; Eichmiller FC; George LA; Meiers JC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Oct; 127(10):1495-500. PubMed ID: 8908919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Superficial roughness on composite surface, composite-enamel and composite-dentin junctions after different finishing and polishing procedures. Part II: roughness with diamond finishing and differences between enamel composite vs body composite.
    Ferraris F; Conti A
    Int J Esthet Dent; 2014; 9(2):184-204. PubMed ID: 24765626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finishing and polishing of indirect composite and ceramic inlays in-vivo: occlusal surfaces.
    Jung M; Wehlen O; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(2):131-41. PubMed ID: 15088723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Abrasive wear of resin composites as related to finishing and polishing procedures.
    Turssi CP; Ferracane JL; Serra MC
    Dent Mater; 2005 Jul; 21(7):641-8. PubMed ID: 15978273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surface geometry of four nanofiller and one hybrid composite after one-step and multiple-step polishing.
    Jung M; Eichelberger K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(4):347-55. PubMed ID: 17695607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of different finishing and polishing techniques on the surface roughness of microfilled, hybrid and packable composite resins.
    Barbosa SH; Zanata RL; Navarro MF; Nunes OB
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 16113932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surface texture of four nanofilled and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Sehr K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17288328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surface geometry of three packable and one hybrid composite after finishing.
    Jung M; Voit S; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):53-9. PubMed ID: 12540119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finishing and polishing of a hybrid composite and a heat-pressed glass ceramic.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):175-83. PubMed ID: 11931137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of toothbrushing on surface characteristics of microhybrid and nanofilled resin composites following different finishing and polishing procedures.
    Daud A; Adams AJ; Shawkat A; Gray G; Wilson NHF; Lynch CD; Blum IR
    J Dent; 2020 Aug; 99():103376. PubMed ID: 32470566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surface roughness and cutting efficiency of composite finishing instruments.
    Jung M
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(3):98-104. PubMed ID: 9484147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials.
    Attar N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jan; 8(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17211502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Surface roughness of finished composite resins.
    Berastegui E; Canalda C; Brau E; Miquel C
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):742-9. PubMed ID: 1331432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of finishing instrumentation on the marginal integrity of resin-based composite restorations.
    Maresca C; Pimenta LA; Heymann HO; Ziemiecki TL; Ritter AV
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2010 Apr; 22(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 20433561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surface properties of dental nanocomposites after finishing with rigid rotary instruments.
    Marchan SM; White D; Marchan QM; Dhuru V; Smith WA
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(5):519-27. PubMed ID: 23327227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.