BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9553545)

  • 1. Assessment of neuroforaminal decompression in degenerative spinal stenosis.
    Gill TJ; Mason MD
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1998 Mar; (348):135-9. PubMed ID: 9553545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Biomechanical aspects of surgical treatment of secondary stenosis of the spinal canal in the lumbosacral region].
    Król R
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 1992; 38():97-112. PubMed ID: 1290356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical assessment of minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a cadaver study.
    Hamasaki T; Tanaka N; Kim J; Okada M; Ochi M; Hutton WC
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Oct; 22(7):486-91. PubMed ID: 20075811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis in younger age patients could lead to higher stresses in the remaining neural arch -- a finite element investigation.
    Ivanov A; Faizan A; Sairyo K; Ebraheim N; Biyani A; Goel VK
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2007 Feb; 50(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 17546538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral interlaminar fenestration and unroofing for the decompression of nerve roots by using a unilateral approach in lumbar canal stenosis.
    Iwatsuki K; Yoshimine T; Aoki M
    Surg Neurol; 2007 Nov; 68(5):487-92; discussion 492. PubMed ID: 17825382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of removing the lateral part of the pars interarticularis on stress distribution at the neural arch in lumbar foraminal microdecompression at L3-L4 and L4-L5: anatomic and finite element investigations.
    Ivanov AA; Faizan A; Ebraheim NA; Yeasting R; Goel VK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Oct; 32(22):2462-6. PubMed ID: 18090086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Bilateral "over the top" decompression through unilateral laminotomy for lumbar and thoracic spinal canal stenosis].
    Banczerowski P; Lipóth L; Veres R
    Ideggyogy Sz; 2007 Nov; 60(11-12):467-73. PubMed ID: 18198793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Muscle-preserving interlaminar decompression for the lumbar spine: a minimally invasive new procedure for lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
    Hatta Y; Shiraishi T; Sakamoto A; Yato Y; Harada T; Mikami Y; Hase H; Kubo T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(8):E276-80. PubMed ID: 19365236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary application of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion with prospace and facet fusion using local autograft.
    Long H; Kazunasa U; Liu S; Akio S; Taito I
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2007 Nov; 21(11):1155-9. PubMed ID: 18069464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of techniques for decompressive lumbar laminectomy: the minimally invasive versus the "classic" open approach.
    Rahman M; Summers LE; Richter B; Mimran RI; Jacob RP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2008 Apr; 51(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 18401823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally invasive lumbar laminectomy via a dual-tube technique: evaluation in a cadaver model.
    Musacchio M; Patel N; Bagan B; Deutsch H; Vaccaro AR; Ratliff J
    Surg Neurol; 2007 Apr; 67(4):348-52. PubMed ID: 17350398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An endoscopic curved Kerrison rongeur for spinal stenosis surgery.
    Frank EH; Martin J; Hsu FP
    Minim Invasive Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 45(4):254-6. PubMed ID: 12494364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Anatomical background of low back pain: variability and degeneration of the lumbar spinal canal and intervertebral disc].
    van Roy P; Barbaix E; Clarijs JP; Mense S
    Schmerz; 2001 Dec; 15(6):418-24. PubMed ID: 11793145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Implications of lumbar plexus anatomy for removal of total disc replacements through a posterior approach.
    Bumpass DB; Keller TC; Robinson EP; Marks I; Iwanik M; Arlet V; Shen FH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Apr; 33(9):E274-8. PubMed ID: 18427306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Functional sequelae of surgical decompression of the lumbar spine--a biomechanical study in vitro].
    Quint U; Wilke HJ; Löer F; Claes LE
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1998; 136(4):350-7. PubMed ID: 9795438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Basic and clinical studies on lumbar vertebral canal expansion with preservation of posterior ligaments complex].
    Ma K; Jiang C; Yang Q; Wu C; Tang K; Li Z; Jiang B; Wang Y
    Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 22(8):918-22. PubMed ID: 18773805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Percent spinal canal compromise on MRI utilized for predicting the need for surgical treatment in single-level lumbar intervertebral disc herniation.
    Carlisle E; Luna M; Tsou PM; Wang JC
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 16291099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-stage decompression for combined epiconus and cauda equina syndrome due to multilevel spinal canal stenosis of the thoracolumbar spine: a case report.
    Hioki A; Miyamoto K; Hosoe H; Fukuta S; Shimizu K
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2008 Sep; 128(9):955-8. PubMed ID: 18283471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [If it becomes too narrow for the spinal cord--plea for a joint venture].
    Rompe JD; Pfeil J
    Orthopade; 2003 Oct; 32(10):847. PubMed ID: 14579014
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transiliac approach for exposure of lumbosacral intervertebral disk and foramen: technique description.
    Carozzo C; Cachon T; Genevois JP; Fau D; Remy D; Daniaux L; Collard F; Viguier E
    Vet Surg; 2008 Jan; 37(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 18199054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.