These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9553563)

  • 21. Bone preserving level of osteotomy in short-stem total hip arthroplasty does not influence stress shielding dimensions - a comparing finite elements analysis.
    Burchard R; Braas S; Soost C; Graw JA; Schmitt J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Aug; 18(1):343. PubMed ID: 28784121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The use of femoral struts and impacted cancellous bone allograft in patients with severe femoral bone loss who undergo revision total hip replacement: a three- to nine-year follow-up.
    Buttaro MA; Costantini J; Comba F; Piccaluga F
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):167-72. PubMed ID: 22323680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Causes for revision of dual-mobility and standard primary total hip arthroplasty : Matched case-control study based on a prospective multicenter study of two thousand and forty four implants.
    Prudhon JL; Desmarchelier R; Hamadouche M; Delaunay C; Verdier R;
    Int Orthop; 2017 Mar; 41(3):455-459. PubMed ID: 26660728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Difficult Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Cases Treated with an Offset Head Center Acetabular Shell.
    Wassef A; Sodhi N; Khlopas A; Sultan AA; Chughtai M; Ramkumar P; Stearns K; Molloy R; Mont MA
    Surg Technol Int; 2019 May; 34():445-450. PubMed ID: 31037719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dual-mobility arthroplasty failure: a rationale review of causes and technical considerations for revision.
    Hernigou P; Dubory A; Potage D; Roubineau F; Flouzat Lachaniette CH
    Int Orthop; 2017 Mar; 41(3):481-490. PubMed ID: 27872981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Dual mobility cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: dislocation rate and survival after 5 years.
    Simian E; Chatellard R; Druon J; Berhouet J; Rosset P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Sep; 101(5):577-81. PubMed ID: 26138633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Conus hip prosthesis.
    Wagner H; Wagner M
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2001; 68(4):213-21. PubMed ID: 11706545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Long-term results of revision total hip arthroplasty with a cemented femoral component.
    Pallaver A; Zwicky L; Bolliger L; Bösebeck H; Manzoni I; Schädelin S; Ochsner PE; Clauss M
    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2018 Nov; 138(11):1609-1616. PubMed ID: 30099575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The potential for bone loss in acetabular structures following THA.
    Manley MT; Ong KL; Kurtz SM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2006 Dec; 453():246-53. PubMed ID: 17006368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Results of revision total knee arthroplasty in the face of significant bone deficiency.
    Rorabeck CH; Smith PN
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 29(2):361-71. PubMed ID: 9553582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The pathogenesis of osteolysis in two different cementless hip replacements.
    Learmonth ID; Smith EJ; Cunningham JL
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 9141891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Obesity Is Independently Associated With Early Aseptic Loosening in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
    Goodnough LH; Finlay AK; Huddleston JI; Goodman SB; Maloney WJ; Amanatullah DF
    J Arthroplasty; 2018 Mar; 33(3):882-886. PubMed ID: 29089226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cancellous impaction grafting in femoral revision THA.
    Padgett DE; Kinkel S
    Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e482-4. PubMed ID: 21902138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Satisfying Results of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Hip Dysplasia at a Mean Followup of 20 Years.
    Colo E; Rijnen WH; Gardeniers JW; van Kampen A; Schreurs BW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2462-2468. PubMed ID: 27492686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Finite element analysis of cementless femoral stems based on mid- and long-term radiological evaluation.
    Matsuyama K; Ishidou Y; Guo YM; Kakoi H; Setoguchi T; Nagano S; Kawamura I; Maeda S; Komiya S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Sep; 17(1):397. PubMed ID: 27642748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Contemporary Surgical Indications and Referral Trends in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Review.
    Haynes JA; Stambough JB; Sassoon AA; Johnson SR; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Mar; 31(3):622-5. PubMed ID: 26541220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Proximal femoral arthroplasty in patients undergoing revision hip arthroplasty.
    March GM; Dehghan N; Gala L; Spangehl MJ; Kim PR
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Nov; 29(11):2171-4. PubMed ID: 25134742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Obesity is Associated With Early Total Hip Revision for Aseptic Loosening.
    Electricwala AJ; Narkbunnam R; Huddleston JI; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB; Amanatullah DF
    J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):217-20. PubMed ID: 27108056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The HA-coated ABG socket in revision arthroplasty.
    Van Hoye M; De Cuyper A; Naert P; Brabants K
    Acta Orthop Belg; 1997; 63 Suppl 1():103-5. PubMed ID: 9532862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Massive bone defect compromises postoperative cup survivorship of acetabular revision hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafting.
    Iwase T; Ito T; Morita D
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2424-9. PubMed ID: 24798193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.