These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9553563)

  • 41. Jumbo cups and morsalized graft.
    Jasty M
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 29(2):249-54. PubMed ID: 9553570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Risk of revision and dislocation in single, dual mobility and large femoral head total hip arthroplasty: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Pituckanotai K; Arirachakaran A; Tuchinda H; Putananon C; Nualsalee N; Setrkraising K; Kongtharvonskul J
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2018 Apr; 28(3):445-455. PubMed ID: 29119371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Acetabular distraction: an alternative approach to pelvic discontinuity in failed total hip replacement.
    Brown NM; Hellman M; Haughom BH; Shah RP; Sporer SM; Paprosky WG
    Bone Joint J; 2014 Nov; 96-B(11 Supple A):73-7. PubMed ID: 25381413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty: maximizing function and outcomes in protrusio and cavitary defects.
    Dahl B; McNeely C; Robinson BS; Maloney WJ; Paprosky WG; Ries MD; Saleh KJ
    Instr Course Lect; 2014; 63():219-25. PubMed ID: 24720308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Total hip arthroplasty revision by dual-mobility acetabular cup cemented in a metal reinforcement: A 62 case series at a minimum 5 years' follow-up.
    Lebeau N; Bayle M; Belhaouane R; Chelli M; Havet E; Brunschweiler B; Mertl P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Sep; 103(5):679-684. PubMed ID: 28578096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Early failures in total hip arthroplasty -- a changing paradigm.
    Melvin JS; Karthikeyan T; Cope R; Fehring TK
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1285-8. PubMed ID: 24444568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
    Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
    Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Comparison of mechanical stress and change in bone mineral density between two types of femoral implant using finite element analysis.
    Hirata Y; Inaba Y; Kobayashi N; Ike H; Fujimaki H; Saito T
    J Arthroplasty; 2013 Dec; 28(10):1731-5. PubMed ID: 23683518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Old and new materials in the hip prosthesis].
    Kowalczewski JB; Milecki M; Marczak D
    Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol; 2006; 71(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 17128769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA associated with fewer dislocations and less muscle degeneration by preserving muscle progenitors.
    Hernigou P; Roussignol X; Delambre J; Poignard A; Flouzat-Lachaniette CH
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 473(12):3762-9. PubMed ID: 26054482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [-Loosening of the complete hip prosthesis. Physiopathology. Therapeutic approach-].
    Nizard RS; Sedel L; Witvoet J
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1997; 40(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 9754348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Restoration of bone stock in revision surgery of the femur.
    Head WC; Malinin TI; Emerson RH; Mallory TH
    Int Orthop; 2000; 24(1):9-14. PubMed ID: 10774854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Pelvic discontinuity: modern techniques and outcomes for treating pelvic disassociation.
    Schwarzkopf R; Ihn HE; Ries MD
    Hip Int; 2015; 25(4):368-74. PubMed ID: 26044526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Do Rerevision Rates Differ After First-time Revision of Primary THA With a Cemented and Cementless Femoral Component?
    Gromov K; Pedersen AB; Overgaard S; Gebuhr P; Malchau H; Troelsen A
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3391-8. PubMed ID: 25762017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Femoral impaction allografting for significant bone loss in revision hip arthroplasty.
    Goff TAJ; Bobak P
    Hip Int; 2017 May; 27(3):281-285. PubMed ID: 28165587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Two-year to five-year follow-up of femoral defects in femoral revision treated with the link MP modular stem.
    Rodriguez JA; Fada R; Murphy SB; Rasquinha VJ; Ranawat CS
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):751-8. PubMed ID: 18977637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Proximal femoral allografts for reconstruction of bone stock in revision arthroplasty of the hip.
    Gross AE; Hutchison CR
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 29(2):313-7. PubMed ID: 9553576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mechanisms of bone loss associated with total hip replacement.
    Jacobs JJ; Sumner DR; Galante JO
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1993 Oct; 24(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 8414423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Treatment of failed allograft prosthesis composites used for hip arthroplasty in the setting of severe proximal femoral bone defects.
    Sternheim A; Drexler M; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Backstein DJ; Gross AE
    J Arthroplasty; 2014 May; 29(5):1058-62. PubMed ID: 24231438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.
    Arumugam G; Nanjayan SK; Quah C; Wraighte P; Howard P
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Dec; 25(8):1279-84. PubMed ID: 26399609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.